review-animations

review-animations is a skill for Claude Code from sandbaseai/sandbase-skills. It costs 37 tokens per session (613 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of accessibility-review, Apache-2.0.

A workflow for creating or reviewing animations, including checks for format, accessibility, performance, and visual output.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to implement or review animated work, preview the actual output, and check it against design and accessibility requirements.
Why use it?
It helps find problems that are not obvious from source files alone, such as incorrect timing, dimensions, accessibility, or runtime behaviour.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the sandbase-skills plugin — 244 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to implement or review animated work, preview the actual output, and check it against design and accessibility requirements.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills/review-animations
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add sandbaseai/sandbase-skills --skill review-animations
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install sandbase-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 244 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-animations

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills/review-animations/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills/review-animations)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills/review-animations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills/review-animations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-animations

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills/review-animations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sandbaseai/sandbase-skills/review-animations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 613 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 88% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00037 $0.00613
Opus 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00245
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00123
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00061

Measured 11d ago against content hash ddba9fb2b348, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-animations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

88% identical to accessibility-review — 15 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

marketing/review-animations/SKILL.md · 47 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 47 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Animations

Use this Skill to produce a bounded, verifiable Review Animations outcome. Preserve the user's chosen stack, source material, and authorization boundaries.

Read the SandBase API map only when the task genuinely needs an external data source or generative model.

Workflow

  1. Inspect the available files, runtime, versions, inputs, and existing conventions before deciding what to change.
  2. Restate the requested outcome, constraints, acceptance checks, and any assumption that could change the result.
  3. Produce the smallest complete implementation, analysis, or artifact that satisfies those checks.
  4. Verify the real output with appropriate tests, previews, calculations, or source comparison; do not infer success from file creation alone.
  5. Return the deliverable, evidence of validation, material assumptions, and unresolved limitations.

Quality gates

  • Confirm canvas or frame dimensions, output format, timing, interaction, target runtime, and accessibility requirements.
  • Preserve the existing design system and implementation stack; use named tokens and reusable structures instead of unexplained one-off values.
  • Render or preview the real output, inspect representative states and breakpoints, and fix clipping, overlap, contrast, motion, or performance defects.

Focus checks

  • Evaluate purpose, timing, easing, continuity, interruptibility, reduced-motion behavior, and compositor performance; report rendered evidence and concrete fixes.

SandBase boundary

Keep the core Review Animations work local. Use SandBase only for generated images, audio, video, or other media that local deterministic tools cannot provide.

  1. Call sandbase_discover with a short capability query.
  2. Call sandbase_inspect for viable candidates and compare the live schema, coverage, limits, output, execution mode, and price.
  3. Prefer a dedicated tool or API the user already has. Send only the minimum necessary data.
  4. Before any paid call, show the endpoint, important arguments, current unit price, call count, and total estimate or uncertainty, then obtain confirmation.
  5. Use sandbase_account before an approved multi-call batch and call sandbase_run only with current schema-defined arguments.
  6. Poll asynchronous work with sandbase_run_get using the same run ID; never resubmit merely because it is pending.
  7. Use sandbase_runs only to recover status or reconcile observed cost.

Read the full file on GitHub · 47 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 47 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A ddba9fb2b348

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-animations is a skill published in the GitHub repository sandbaseai/sandbase-skills (201 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 613 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to accessibility-review, differing in 15 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

skin-studio

A production guide for creating skins, or visual themes, for the DSH launcher and its main interface. It covers design variables, tokens, templates, background placeholders, and the skinstudio tool.

WZZNNE/DSH-CyberWorkStation · 56 tokens

vision-skills

Playbooks for visual tasks with dsh-vision-bridge — long screenshot OCR, restore UI/graphic/structure, GUI ops. Use when the user asks to work with images.

WZZNNE/DSH-CyberWorkStation · 41 tokens

make-interfaces-feel-better

Design engineering principles for making interfaces feel polished. Use when building UI components, reviewing frontend code, implementing animations, hover states, shadows, borders, typography, icons, micro-interactions, enter/exit animations, or any visual detail work. Supports quick and full review modes. Triggers…

stvlynn/dsh.fish · 117 tokens

diagram-design

Create branded architecture, IT current-state, flowchart, sequence, state machine, ER/data model, timeline, swimlane, quadrant, radar/spider, polar chart (polar/radial lollipop), loop/flywheel, nested, tree, org chart, layer stack, Venn, pyramid/funnel, treemap, bar, line, Gantt and scatter charts, high-level…

stvlynn/dsh.fish · 188 tokens

apple-design

Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading)…

stvlynn/dsh.fish · 80 tokens

emil-design-eng

This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

stvlynn/dsh.fish · 35 tokens