Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sandeepmvl/rails-skills --skill 52-gdpr-railsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sandeepmvl/rails-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sandeepmvl/rails-skills/52-gdpr-rails)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sandeepmvl/rails-skills/52-gdpr-rails"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sandeepmvl/rails-skills/52-gdpr-rails/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sandeepmvl/rails-skills/52-gdpr-rails"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sandeepmvl/rails-skills/52-gdpr-rails.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.02783 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00058 | $0.01392 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00557 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00278 |
Grade A, and why
gdpr-rails scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 332 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GDPR for Rails
GDPR governs personal data of EU residents. The technical asks: let users see, export, correct, and delete their data; record the lawful basis; minimize data collection; notify breaches in 72 hours. This skill is the engineering side — get a privacy lawyer for the legal program.
The opinion
Build a Data Subject portal (export + delete) from day one — bolted on later is painful. Record lawful basis on every personal-data field (consent / contract / legitimate interest). Use pseudonymisation (replace identifiers with reference IDs) for analytics. Audit logs of personal-data access survive erasure. Sign Data Processing Agreements with every vendor handling EU data. Skip the cookie banner if you only use strictly-necessary cookies; otherwise use a consent-management platform (CMP).
What's personal data
Anything that identifies a person OR can be combined with other data to do so:
- Name, email, phone, address, DOB
- IP address, device ID, advertising ID, cookies
- Photos, voice recordings
- Account IDs, order history
- Location data
- Behaviour data when linked to a user
If you can answer "is X about a specific person?" with yes (or "with effort"), GDPR applies.
Pattern 1: Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) export
class DataSubjectRequest < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :user
enum :request_type, { export: 0, deletion: 1, correction: 2 }
enum :status, { pending: 0, in_progress: 1, completed: 2, denied: 3 }
validates :request_type, presence: true
end
class DsarExporter
def initialize(user)
@user = user
end
def call
{
account: account_data,
orders: orders_data,
activity: activity_data,
consents: consent_data,
messages: messages_data
}
end
private
def account_data
@user.attributes.except("password_digest", "encrypted_password")
end
def orders_data
@user.orders.map { |o| o.attributes.merge(lines: o.lines.map(&:attributes)) }
end
def activity_data
# GDPR Art. 15 requires the full dataset — no silent truncation.
AuditLog.where(user: @user).pluck(:action, :ip_address, :created_at)
end
def consent_data
@user.consents.pluck(:purpose, :given_at, :revoked_at)
end
def messages_data
Message.where(from_user: @user).or(Message.where(to_user: @user)).pluck(:subject, :body, :created_at)
end
end
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 332 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 1fa8f3b5d6ba
gdpr-rails is a skill published in the GitHub repository sandeepmvl/rails-skills (21 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 2,783 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…