Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sandgardenhq/sgai --skill go-testing-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sandgardenhq/sgaiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sandgardenhq/sgai/go-testing-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sandgardenhq/sgai/go-testing-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sandgardenhq/sgai/go-testing-coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sandgardenhq/sgai/go-testing-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sandgardenhq/sgai/go-testing-coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02659 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01329 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00532 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00266 |
Grade A, and why
go-testing-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 515 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 7dbeb0ba8de8
go-testing-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository sandgardenhq/sgai (132 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,659 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
golang-testing
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI…
golang-stretchr-testify
Comprehensive guide to stretchr/testify for Golang testing. Covers assert, require, mock, and suite packages in depth. Use when writing tests with testify, creating mocks, setting up test suites, or choosing between assert and require. Covers testify assertions, mock expectations, argument matchers, call verification…
setup
Wire Ginkgo into a Go package — install the ginkgo CLI and Ginkgo+Gomega, ginkgo bootstrap to generate the suitetest.go (TestXxx/RegisterFailHandler(Fail)/RunSpecs), the package xxxtest convention, dot-import alternatives (aliased import, dsl/ subpackages, --nodot), ginkgo generate, and testing.T interop via…
assertions
Write correct synchronous Gomega assertions — Expect/Ω notation, the To/NotTo/ToNot/Should/ShouldNot equivalences, the multi-return error idiom, Succeed vs HaveOccurred, the .Error() chaining form, annotating assertions (format-string and func()string), tuning failure output via the format subpackage…
gstruct
Deep, partial matching of nested structs, slices, maps, and pointers with gstruct — MatchAllFields/MatchFields/Fields, MatchAllElements/MatchElements/Elements (idFn), MatchAllKeys/MatchKeys/Keys, PointTo, and the IgnoreExtras/IgnoreMissing/IgnoreUnexportedExtras/AllowDuplicates options, plus Ignore()/Reject(). Use…
overview
The Ginkgo mental model for writing Go tests — the one idea that explains everything (Ginkgo builds a spec tree at construction time, then runs it) and its consequences for how you write specs, plus spec independence and the node taxonomy. Use this first when you start working with Ginkgo in a project, or to decide…