Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sanhuang520-ship-it/awesome-chinese-ai-tools --skill chinese-work-reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sanhuang520-ship-it/awesome-chinese-ai-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sanhuang520-ship-it/awesome-chinese-ai-tools/chinese-work-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sanhuang520-ship-it/awesome-chinese-ai-tools/chinese-work-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sanhuang520-ship-it/awesome-chinese-ai-tools/chinese-work-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sanhuang520-ship-it/awesome-chinese-ai-tools/chinese-work-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sanhuang520-ship-it/awesome-chinese-ai-tools/chinese-work-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.01390 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00695 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
chinese-work-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
职场汇报助手
汇报的本质不是"我做了什么"，而是"我创造了什么价值，接下来要什么支持"。
什么时候用
周报、月报、季度总结、年终总结、述职报告、项目汇报、复盘、工作计划、汇报 PPT 大纲。
第一步：先确认场景
不同场景写法差很多，先问清（一次问完）：
- 汇报类型（周报/月报/述职/项目汇报/复盘）
- 汇报对象（直属领导/跨部门/大老板/客户）—— 决定详略和角度
- 岗位/业务（技术/运营/销售/职能）
- 本期主要做了什么（用户口述，不用整理）
- 有没有数据（有数据的汇报强 10 倍）
核心原则
1. 结论先行
❌ "本周我跟进了 A 项目，参加了 3 次会议，然后..." ✅ "本周核心进展：A 项目提前 2 天上线，转化率提升 12%。"
领导只看前三行。 把最重要的结论放最前面。
2. 说价值，不说动作
| ❌ 动作描述 | ✅ 价值描述 |
|---|---|
| 优化了查询接口 | 查询响应从 3s 降到 0.4s，客服投诉减少 |
| 联系了 20 个客户 | 新签 3 家，预计季度增收 15 万 |
| 整理了文档 | 新人上手时间从 2 周缩短到 3 天 |
方法：写完一条，问自己"所以呢？对业务有什么影响？"
3. 数据要有对比
单独一个数字没有意义：
- ❌ "转化率 3.2%"
- ✅ "转化率 3.2%，环比 +0.8pp，超目标 0.2pp"
对比维度：环比 / 同比 / 目标达成 / 行业基准
4. 问题要带方案
暴露问题不是甩锅，但只提问题不给方案 = 制造焦虑。
格式：问题 + 影响 + 我的方案 + 需要的支持
各类型结构
周报（简洁，200-400 字）
【本周核心进展】
1. （最重要的 1-3 条，带数据）
【问题与风险】
（有就写，没有就删掉这栏，不要凑）
【下周计划】
1. （3 条以内，可衡量）
【需要支持】
（明确说要什么，不要含糊）
月报 / 季度总结（结构化，800-1500 字）
一、目标达成情况
（表格：指标 | 目标 | 实际 | 完成率）
二、重点工作回顾
（3-5 项，每项：做了什么 → 结果如何 → 价值在哪）
三、问题与不足
（2-3 条，带原因分析）
四、下阶段计划
（目标 + 关键动作 + 时间节点）
述职报告（1500-3000 字）
一、岗位职责与目标
二、主要工作成果（重点，占一半篇幅，必须有数据）
三、能力成长
四、不足与改进
五、下一阶段规划
述职是为自己争取的场合，成果部分要充分，但不能虚构。
项目汇报（面向决策）
1. 一页纸结论（现状 + 结论 + 要什么）
2. 背景与目标
3. 进展与数据
4. 风险与应对
5. 决策请求（明确列出需要拍板的事项）
复盘
1. 目标回顾（原本要达成什么）
2. 结果对比（实际如何，差距多少）
3. 差异分析（为什么，客观 + 主观）
4. 经验沉淀（可复用的方法）
5. 后续行动（具体到人和时间）
汇报 PPT 大纲
用户要 PPT 时，输出分页大纲：
P1 封面：标题 + 汇报人 + 日期
P2 目录
P3 一页纸结论（最重要，领导可能只看这页）
P4-6 分项进展（一页一个重点，配图表建议）
P7 问题与风险
P8 下阶段计划
P9 需要的支持
每页标注：标题 + 3 个要点 + 建议图表类型
语言风格
- 平实，不要"赋能""抓手""闭环"这类黑话堆砌
- 短句，一句话说一件事
- 主动语态，"我完成了"而不是"该工作被完成"
- 数字用阿拉伯数字，便于快速扫读
注意事项
- 不编造数据。用户没给数据就留占位符
【填写实际数据】，不要瞎编。 - 不夸大成果。虚构的成绩在追问时会崩。
- 注意汇报对象。给大老板的要更精简、更聚焦结论；给直属领导可以更细。
- 敏感内容提醒。涉及同事评价、部门矛盾时，建议用户当面沟通而非书面。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 156 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 9a0fc46c4755
chinese-work-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository sanhuang520-ship-it/awesome-chinese-ai-tools (10 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 1,390 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-curator
A Chinese-language evaluator for deciding whether developer tools and agent resources are suitable for a curated collection. It checks real repositories, installation paths, activity, duplicates, and security boundaries using evidence.
git-workflow
A guide for handling Git repository work safely, including status checks, branches, commits, pushes, pull requests, and rebasing. Git is a version-control system that records code changes and coordinates work between developers.
i18n-helper
A helper for adding internationalization, which lets software show different languages and regional text. It finds user-visible text written directly in code and moves it into language files.
log-analyzer
A log-analysis helper that reads application and system logs to find unusual patterns and likely causes. Logs are records of events such as errors, requests, warnings, and service activity.
update-dependencies
Upgrade project dependencies with breaking change research for major version updates. Use when the user asks to "update dependencies", "upgrade packages", "upgrade dependencies", "update deps", "upgrade deps", "update npm deps", "update Swift packages", "cargo update", "go get updates", "bundle update", or "pip…
review-plan
Review a plan by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my plan", "check my plan", "critique my plan", or wants feedback on a plan.