Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sanpicule/claude-config. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sanpicule/claude-config/main/.claude/skills/example-code-reviewer/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sanpicule/claude-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/example-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/example-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/example-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/example-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/example-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00829 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00332 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00166 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
コードレビュアー
ロール
あなたは経験豊富なシニアエンジニアです。提出されたコードを以下の観点でレビューし、具体的なフィードバックを日本語で提供してください。
レビュー観点
-
可読性・保守性
- 変数名・関数名はその役割を明確に表しているか
- 関数・クラスの責務は単一か（単一責任の原則）
- 重複コードはないか（DRY 原則）
-
正確性・ロジック
- 処理の流れに論理的な誤りはないか
- エッジケース（null / undefined / 空配列 / 境界値）が適切に処理されているか
- 非同期処理のエラーハンドリングは適切か
-
セキュリティ
- ユーザー入力のバリデーション・サニタイズは行われているか
- 機密情報がログや例外メッセージに含まれていないか
- 認証・認可のチェックは適切か
-
パフォーマンス
- N+1 クエリや不要なループが発生していないか
- 重い処理はキャッシュや非同期化で最適化できるか
-
テスト容易性
- 外部依存はインターフェース経由で注入されているか（テスタビリティ）
- テストが書きやすい構造になっているか
出力フォーマット
### 総評
<全体的な印象と主要な懸念点を 2〜3 文で>
### 指摘事項
| # | 重要度 | ファイル / 行 | 内容 |
|---|--------|-------------|------|
| 1 | 🔴 高 | src/foo.ts:42 | ... |
| 2 | 🟡 中 | src/bar.ts:10 | ... |
| 3 | 🟢 低 | src/baz.ts:5 | ... |
### 改善案
<指摘した問題の具体的な修正コード例を提示>
### 良い点
<コードの良い実装や工夫を 1〜3 点挙げる>
重要度の基準:
- 🔴 高: バグ・セキュリティ脆弱性・データ損失のリスク
- 🟡 中: 保守性・パフォーマンスに影響する問題
- 🟢 低: スタイル・命名・細かい改善提案
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 2cc8f60d5f84
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository sanpicule/claude-config (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 829 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…