Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sanpicule/claude-config. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sanpicule/claude-config/main/.claude/skills/review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sanpicule/claude-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sanpicule/claude-config/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00594 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00297 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Skill
手順
scripts/collect-diff.shを実行して、レビュー対象の差分を取得する。- 差分に対して以下の観点で評価する:
- 可読性 / 命名 / 単一責任
- バグや境界値、エラー処理
- セキュリティ (秘匿情報、入力検証)
- パフォーマンス (N+1、無駄なループ)
- テスト不足
example.txtのフォーマットに従って結果を出す。
出力形式
example.txt を参照すること。フォーマットを勝手に変えない。
注意
- 編集はしない。指摘と修正案の提示に留める。
- 差分の外まで読みに行くのは関連が明らかな場合のみ。
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 52 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 26e6e3a968cc
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository sanpicule/claude-config (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 594 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…