Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add saolalab/clawforce --skill people-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saolalab/clawforceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saolalab/clawforce/people-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saolalab/clawforce/people-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saolalab/clawforce/people-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saolalab/clawforce/people-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saolalab/clawforce/people-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.02825 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.01130 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00565 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00282 |
Grade A, and why
people-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 389 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
People Operations
Performance Review Template
# Performance Review: {Employee Name} — {Period}
**Review Period**: {Start Date} to {End Date}
**Reviewer**: {Manager Name}
**Date**: {Review Date}
**Role**: {Job Title}
## Overall Performance Rating
**Rating**: Exceeds Expectations / Meets Expectations / Below Expectations / Needs Improvement
**Summary**: {2-3 sentence summary of overall performance}
## Goals & Objectives
### Goal 1: {Goal Description}
- **Status**: Achieved / Partially Achieved / Not Achieved
- **Results**: {Specific outcomes and metrics}
- **Notes**: {Additional context}
### Goal 2: {Goal Description}
- **Status**: Achieved / Partially Achieved / Not Achieved
- **Results**: {Specific outcomes and metrics}
- **Notes**: {Additional context}
### Goal 3: {Goal Description}
- **Status**: Achieved / Partially Achieved / Not Achieved
- **Results**: {Specific outcomes and metrics}
- **Notes**: {Additional context}
## Strengths & Achievements
- {Strength 1 with specific examples}
- {Strength 2 with specific examples}
- {Strength 3 with specific examples}
## Areas for Development
- {Development area 1 with specific examples and suggestions}
- {Development area 2 with specific examples and suggestions}
## Feedback from Peers (360 Review)
### Positive Feedback Themes
- {Theme 1: e.g., "Strong collaboration skills"}
- {Theme 2: e.g., "Reliable and dependable"}
### Development Suggestions
- {Suggestion 1}
- {Suggestion 2}
## Development Plan
### Short-term Goals (Next Quarter)
- {Goal 1}
- {Goal 2}
- {Goal 3}
### Development Activities
- {Activity 1: e.g., "Attend leadership training"}
- {Activity 2: e.g., "Take on project management responsibility"}
- {Activity 3: e.g., "Mentor junior team member"}
### Support Needed
- {Support 1: e.g., "Additional training resources"}
- {Support 2: e.g., "More frequent check-ins"}
## Career Growth
### Career Interests
{Employee's stated career interests and goals}
### Growth Opportunities
{Potential paths for advancement or skill development}
## Employee Comments
{Space for employee to provide their own comments and feedback}
---
**Employee Signature**: _________________ **Date**: _________
**Manager Signature**: _________________ **Date**: _________
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 389 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A d959f6898d0a
people-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository saolalab/clawforce (38 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 2,825 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-meeting-scheduling
Booking links fail for groups. SkipUp schedules meetings with 2-50 participants via email — one API call coordinates across timezones automatically. Also: check status, pause, resume, or cancel requests. Async only — does not instant-book, access calendars, or do free/busy lookups.
03_task5
Triages a support inbox, prioritizes urgent issues, routes each to the right internal team member, and drafts any customer-facing replies for review. Use when: catching up on a backlog of support messages, producing an escalation report, or routing issues to appropriate owners.
03_task2
Extracts action items and pending tasks from Slack messages. Use when: reviewing unread messages for todos, finding deadlines or requests directed at the user, or producing a task summary from recent Slack activity.
calendar-reminders
Calendar reminders pipeline: config-driven wrapper around gcalcli (Google Calendar) plus optional CalDAV source via vdirsyncer+khal, and a reminder planner that outputs a JSON plan for one-shot OpenClaw reminders.
file-manager
A file and folder management helper for organizing files on a computer.
daily-rhythm
Automated daily planning and reflection system with morning briefs, wind-down prompts, sleep nudges, and weekly reviews. Use when the user wants to set up a structured daily routine, morning briefings, evening reflection prompts, or weekly planning sessions. Triggers include requests for daily schedules, morning…