Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/saolalab/clawforce/people-opsnpx skills add saolalab/clawforce --skill people-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saolalab/clawforceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saolalab/clawforce/people-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saolalab/clawforce/people-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saolalab/clawforce/people-ops.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00048 | $0.02825 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01412 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00565 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00282 |
Grade A, and why
people-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 389 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
People Operations
Performance Review Template
# Performance Review: {Employee Name} — {Period}
**Review Period**: {Start Date} to {End Date}
**Reviewer**: {Manager Name}
**Date**: {Review Date}
**Role**: {Job Title}
## Overall Performance Rating
**Rating**: Exceeds Expectations / Meets Expectations / Below Expectations / Needs Improvement
**Summary**: {2-3 sentence summary of overall performance}
## Goals & Objectives
### Goal 1: {Goal Description}
- **Status**: Achieved / Partially Achieved / Not Achieved
- **Results**: {Specific outcomes and metrics}
- **Notes**: {Additional context}
### Goal 2: {Goal Description}
- **Status**: Achieved / Partially Achieved / Not Achieved
- **Results**: {Specific outcomes and metrics}
- **Notes**: {Additional context}
### Goal 3: {Goal Description}
- **Status**: Achieved / Partially Achieved / Not Achieved
- **Results**: {Specific outcomes and metrics}
- **Notes**: {Additional context}
## Strengths & Achievements
- {Strength 1 with specific examples}
- {Strength 2 with specific examples}
- {Strength 3 with specific examples}
## Areas for Development
- {Development area 1 with specific examples and suggestions}
- {Development area 2 with specific examples and suggestions}
## Feedback from Peers (360 Review)
### Positive Feedback Themes
- {Theme 1: e.g., "Strong collaboration skills"}
- {Theme 2: e.g., "Reliable and dependable"}
### Development Suggestions
- {Suggestion 1}
- {Suggestion 2}
## Development Plan
### Short-term Goals (Next Quarter)
- {Goal 1}
- {Goal 2}
- {Goal 3}
### Development Activities
- {Activity 1: e.g., "Attend leadership training"}
- {Activity 2: e.g., "Take on project management responsibility"}
- {Activity 3: e.g., "Mentor junior team member"}
### Support Needed
- {Support 1: e.g., "Additional training resources"}
- {Support 2: e.g., "More frequent check-ins"}
## Career Growth
### Career Interests
{Employee's stated career interests and goals}
### Growth Opportunities
{Potential paths for advancement or skill development}
## Employee Comments
{Space for employee to provide their own comments and feedback}
---
**Employee Signature**: _________________ **Date**: _________
**Manager Signature**: _________________ **Date**: _________
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 389 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A d959f6898d0a
people-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository saolalab/clawforce (38 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 2,825 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
nemoclaw-contributor-implement-issue
Implement an accepted NemoClaw GitHub issue in the current checkout. Use when a user asks to pick up an issue for implementation, implement or fix a named issue, or add the issue's tests. Confirm accepted scope, deliver the smallest independently valuable capability slice, and record validation and remaining gates…
tmux
Remote-control tmux sessions for interactive CLIs by sending keystrokes and scraping pane output.
summarize
Summarize or extract text/transcripts from URLs, podcasts, and local files (great fallback for “transcribe this YouTube/video”).
add-matrix
Add Matrix channel integration via Chat SDK. Works with any Matrix homeserver.
add-resend
Add Resend (email) channel integration via Chat SDK.
add-macos-statusbar
Add a macOS menu bar status indicator for NanoClaw. Shows a bolt icon with a green/red dot indicating whether NanoClaw is running, with Start, Stop, and Restart controls. macOS only.