Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sapdev-ai/sap-dev --skill sap-where-used-listgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sapdev-ai/sap-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sapdev-ai/sap-dev/sap-where-used-list)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sapdev-ai/sap-dev/sap-where-used-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sapdev-ai/sap-dev/sap-where-used-list/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sapdev-ai/sap-dev/sap-where-used-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sapdev-ai/sap-dev/sap-where-used-list.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00212 | $0.05101 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00085 | $0.02040 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.01020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00510 |
Grade A, and why
sap-where-used-list scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 337 lines · 212 tokens per session scan A c17dc16e1ede
sap-where-used-list is a skill published in the GitHub repository sapdev-ai/sap-dev (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 212 tokens to every session and 5,101 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-it
Build production-ready systems with stability patterns: circuit breakers, bulkheads, timeouts, and retry logic. Use when the user mentions "production outage", "circuit breaker", "deployment pipeline", "chaos engineering", "retry storm", "health checks", "my service keeps crashing", "prevent cascading failures", or…
debug
Interactive debugging workflow with hypothesis-driven probe loop. Use when: unknown bugs, script errors, silent failures, troubleshooting. Not for: known bugs (use bug-fix), GitHub issue analysis (use issue-analyze), code understanding (use code-explore). Output: debug report with probe journal + root cause + fix.
anti-patterns
Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that greatcto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect (pre-impl), pm (planning), senior-dev (impl), l3-support (post-incident).
windows-compat
Audit and harden this Rust repo (code-graph-mcp) for Windows correctness: path-spelling drift between producers, the 32,767-char command-line cap, index-key mismatches, and path predicates that assume one ecosystem's layout. Use whenever touching code that builds, compares, prints, or stores a filesystem path; that…
apex-review
Cross-cutting review of recent work — catches gaps between specialists. Use when asked to "review what we built", "check the work", "pre-launch review", or after completing a significant chunk of work.
chaos
Design, run, and debug Chaos Engineering experiments on Kubernetes using Litmus Chaos v3 and Chaos Mesh v2. Covers fault injection (pod-delete, network-loss, CPU stress, node-drain), steady-state hypothesis probes, GameDay runbooks, scheduled experiments, DORA feedback loop, and RBAC setup. Use when asked to "inject a…