Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill --skill competition-container-runtimegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-container-runtime)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-container-runtime"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-container-runtime/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-container-runtime"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-container-runtime.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00109 | $0.00684 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.00274 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
competition-container-runtime scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competition-container-runtime — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competition Container Runtime
Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.
Use this skill when the challenge is really about what the live container or pod is doing now, not what the checked-in manifest claims it should do.
Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.
Quick Start
- Split intent from reality: manifest, image, startup, live mount, live route, live process.
- Map host -> proxy -> container or pod -> mounted volume -> consuming process.
- Keep secrets, rendered config, init output, and sidecar output separate from static manifests.
- Prove one minimal live path from mounted or injected state to reachable behavior.
- Reproduce the effect with the smallest runtime-specific chain.
Workflow
1. Map The Live Runtime
- Compare compose or kube manifests against running containers, pods, mounted volumes, env, sidecars, init containers, and entrypoints.
- Identify which process actually consumes the mounted secret, rendered config, or shared volume output.
2. Trace Route And Mount Boundaries
- Map virtual host, reverse proxy, service, container port, filesystem mount, and runtime-generated file paths together.
- Record whether the decisive state is image-baked, env-injected, mounted later, or written by an init/sidecar process.
3. Report The Runtime Deviation
- State the earliest point where live runtime diverges from checked-in intent.
- Keep one compact evidence chain from manifest or compose intent to live consumer behavior.
Read This Reference
- Load
references/container-runtime.mdfor the runtime checklist, mount-chain checklist, and common live-vs-static pitfalls. - If the hard part is kube API permissions, service-account trust, RBAC edges, admission mutations, or controller-created workload drift, prefer
$competition-k8s-control-plane. - If the hard part is Host-header routing, path-prefix rewriting, or route-to-service mapping across nodes, prefer
$competition-runtime-routing. - If the hard part is proving container-to-host crossover, kernel attack-surface preconditions, or stable escape primitives, prefer
$competition-kernel-container-escape. - If the hard part is replaying Linux secrets, socket trust edges, or host-to-host pivots after container foothold, prefer
$competition-linux-credential-pivot.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 52 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A 87412c06f8ca
competition-container-runtime is a skill published in the GitHub repository Saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill (3 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 684 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competition-container-runtime, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
burp-scan
Burp Suite scanning via MCP tools — passive traffic analysis, active payload testing, OOB verification, and vulnerability reporting using Burp's proxy, HTTP sender, Collaborator, and scanner APIs. Use when the user has Burp Suite running with the AI Agent MCP server and wants to scan, test, or analyze web traffic…
supply-chain-security
Assess software supply chains through SBOM and dependency analysis, container scanning, CI/CD review, and build provenance. Use for dependency risks, pipeline security, and third-party component assessments.
ci-cd-expert
Enterprise CI/CD, optimization, security, & delivery expert. Covers GHA, GitLab CI, Jenkins, monorepos (Turbo, Nx, Bazel), containers (BuildKit, Kaniko), GitOps (Argo), delivery (Spinnaker, Kayenta, Fastlane, Flyway), OIDC, and Android. Use for: pipelines, caching, GitOps, monorepos, OIDC, DB migrations, mobile…
apple-container-expert
Expert guide for Apple's native container CLI (apple/container) — the open-source, Swift-native, VM-per-container runtime for Apple Silicon macOS. Read this skill BEFORE answering any question about: installing or starting apple/container; container run/build/machine/volume/network commands; configuring config.toml…
competition-container-runtime
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for live container runtime analysis, mounted secrets, sidecars, namespaces, init containers, entrypoint drift, and route-to-container resolution. Use when the user asks why a live container differs from manifests, where a mounted secret is…
competition-k8s-control-plane
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kubernetes API analysis, service-account trust, RBAC edges, admission and controller behavior, cluster secrets, workload mutation, and namespace-scoped drift. Use when the user asks to inspect kube API permissions, service-account tokens…