Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill --skill competition-dpapi-credential-chaingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-dpapi-credential-chain)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-dpapi-credential-chain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-dpapi-credential-chain.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.00696 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00058 | $0.00348 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
competition-dpapi-credential-chain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competition-dpapi-credential-chain — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competition Dpapi Credential Chain
Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.
Use this skill when the decisive Windows secret is DPAPI-protected and the hard part is proving which context unwraps it and where the plaintext is accepted.
Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.
Quick Start
- Separate protected blob, masterkey, decrypting context, and final accepting service.
- Record SID, user or machine context, masterkey path, vault or browser store, and target replay point before broad conclusions.
- Keep DPAPI source artifact, unwrap step, plaintext secret, and acceptance edge in one chain.
- Distinguish local user DPAPI, machine DPAPI, domain backup key use, and application-specific wrapping.
- Reproduce the smallest DPAPI-to-accepted-access path that proves the decisive edge.
Workflow
1. Map Protected Secret And DPAPI Context
- Record blob source, masterkey location, SID, protector scope, profile path, credential store, and any application wrapper such as browser encryption or vault metadata.
- Note whether the decisive value lives in Credential Manager, Vault, browser cookies, browser passwords, Wi-Fi profiles, RDP files, or custom app storage.
- Keep protected artifact, masterkey candidate, and account or machine context tied together.
2. Prove Unwrap And Acceptance
- Show how the secret is decrypted: user logon material, machine context, domain backup key, or another recovered protector.
- Record plaintext type, target host or service, replay method, and resulting session, token, or data access.
- Distinguish successful blob decryption from actual accepted access.
3. Reduce To The Decisive DPAPI Chain
- Compress the result to the smallest sequence: protected artifact -> masterkey or unwrap context -> plaintext secret -> accepted replay or access -> resulting capability.
- State clearly whether the decisive edge lives in masterkey recovery, DPAPI scope confusion, application wrapper handling, or the service that accepts the recovered secret.
- If the task broadens into generic LSASS ticket material or full Windows pivoting, hand back to the tighter host or pivot skill.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 51 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 029cf3988446
competition-dpapi-credential-chain is a skill published in the GitHub repository Saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 696 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competition-dpapi-credential-chain, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
burp-scan
Burp Suite scanning via MCP tools — passive traffic analysis, active payload testing, OOB verification, and vulnerability reporting using Burp's proxy, HTTP sender, Collaborator, and scanner APIs. Use when the user has Burp Suite running with the AI Agent MCP server and wants to scan, test, or analyze web traffic…
solopi-ai
A command-line framework for testing Android apps and devices with SoloPi, including on-device or cloud AI decision models. It manages devices, test cases, recorded interactions, replays, performance history, and evidence.
argent-tv-interact
Control and inspect TV apps via argent — Apple TV (tvOS), Android TV (leanback), and Amazon Fire TV (Vega). Boot the target, read focus, navigate with the D-pad remote, type, screenshot, and on Vega debug the JS runtime (evaluate, console logs, network inspector). Use when a task targets a TV (runtimeKind "tv", or…
flutter-feature-based-clean-architecture
Organize Flutter apps with modular feature-based clean architecture. Use when creating features under lib/features/ with domain, data, and presentation layers. Do not use for test-only, BlocBuilder, navigation, or spinner requests.
database-redis
Optimize Redis as cache and coordination infrastructure with TTL, eviction, and latency-aware key design. Use when implementing Redis caching, key invalidation, or Redis performance work.
Detox Mobile Testing
Gray-box end-to-end testing for React Native apps with Detox. Covers .detoxrc.js configuration, build and test commands, matchers, device.launchApp control, automatic synchronization, and macOS CI pipelines.