Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill --skill competition-request-normalization-smugglinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-request-normalization-smuggling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-request-normalization-smuggling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill/competition-request-normalization-smuggling.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00109 | $0.00556 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00111 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
competition-request-normalization-smuggling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competition-request-normalization-smuggling — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competition Request Normalization Smuggling
Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.
Use this skill when request interpretation changes between proxy, middleware, and backend parser layers.
Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.
Quick Start
- Map every parsing hop: client-facing proxy, gateway, app server, and downstream service.
- Record path normalization, header canonicalization, transfer framing, and host derivation at each hop.
- Capture one accepted baseline request and one differential request with minimal delta.
- Prove which hop interprets the request differently.
- Reproduce one minimal differential path that yields decisive behavior.
Workflow
1. Map Parse And Routing Boundaries
- Record
Host, forwarded headers, path decoding, slash collapsing, dot-segment handling, and case behavior. - Note
Content-Length,Transfer-Encoding, chunk framing, and connection reuse behavior when relevant. - Keep edge parser and backend parser decisions side by side.
2. Prove Differential Interpretation
- Build paired requests that differ in one canonicalization dimension only.
- Capture proxy logs, backend logs, route match, and downstream request shape.
- Show where route, auth scope, or body boundary diverges.
3. Reduce To Decisive Smuggling Chain
- Compress to: crafted request -> parser differential across hops -> unintended routed request or hidden endpoint reach -> resulting effect.
- State whether root cause is path normalization drift, header ambiguity, transfer framing differential, or host-derivation confusion.
- If the chain becomes primarily runtime routing without framing tricks, hand off to runtime routing skill.
Read This Reference
- Load
references/request-normalization-smuggling.mdfor parse-differential checklist and evidence packaging.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 51 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A 9b9dd18133e2
competition-request-normalization-smuggling is a skill published in the GitHub repository Saprophytic-seattle561/reverse-skill (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 556 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competition-request-normalization-smuggling, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
burp-scan
Burp Suite scanning via MCP tools — passive traffic analysis, active payload testing, OOB verification, and vulnerability reporting using Burp's proxy, HTTP sender, Collaborator, and scanner APIs. Use when the user has Burp Suite running with the AI Agent MCP server and wants to scan, test, or analyze web traffic…
solopi-ai
A command-line framework for testing Android apps and devices with SoloPi, including on-device or cloud AI decision models. It manages devices, test cases, recorded interactions, replays, performance history, and evidence.
argent-tv-interact
Control and inspect TV apps via argent — Apple TV (tvOS), Android TV (leanback), and Amazon Fire TV (Vega). Boot the target, read focus, navigate with the D-pad remote, type, screenshot, and on Vega debug the JS runtime (evaluate, console logs, network inspector). Use when a task targets a TV (runtimeKind "tv", or…
flutter-feature-based-clean-architecture
Organize Flutter apps with modular feature-based clean architecture. Use when creating features under lib/features/ with domain, data, and presentation layers. Do not use for test-only, BlocBuilder, navigation, or spinner requests.
Detox Mobile Testing
Gray-box end-to-end testing for React Native apps with Detox. Covers .detoxrc.js configuration, build and test commands, matchers, device.launchApp control, automatic synchronization, and macOS CI pipelines.
database-redis
Optimize Redis as cache and coordination infrastructure with TTL, eviction, and latency-aware key design. Use when implementing Redis caching, key invalidation, or Redis performance work.