Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Sarthib7/agentsmith --skill git-worktree-runnergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sarthib7/agentsmithWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sarthib7/agentsmith/git-worktree-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sarthib7/agentsmith/git-worktree-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sarthib7/agentsmith/git-worktree-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sarthib7/agentsmith/git-worktree-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sarthib7/agentsmith/git-worktree-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00785 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
git-worktree-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 73 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A d49e36398c1e
git-worktree-runner is a skill published in the GitHub repository Sarthib7/agentsmith (10 stars, last pushed 12d ago), with no licence file. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 785 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
loop-it
An automated workflow that repeatedly fetches open GitHub issues, orders them by dependencies, implements them, reviews the changes, and ships them.
ship-it
A GitHub workflow for finishing an implemented issue: commit the relevant changes, push a branch, create a pull request, merge it, and close the issue. GitHub is a service for hosting code and reviewing changes, and a pull request is a proposed change for review.
fix-pr-review-loop
Use when the user asks to fix a PR review and drive it to approval autonomously — "fix the PR review and loop until approved", "fix-pr-review-loop", "keep addressing review comments until this PR is approved". Takes an optional PR number/URL (defaults to the current branch's PR). Repeatedly calls fix-pr-review, waits…
create-release
Use when the user asks to "create a release", "cut a release", "tag a version", "publish release notes", or ship a new versioned GitHub release for the current repo.
new-issue
Use when the user says "new issue", "create an issue", "file an issue", "/new-issue", or asks to turn a bug, idea, or discussion into a GitHub issue. Takes an optional description of what the issue should cover; with no input, derives the issue from what was discussed in the current conversation. Verifies claims…
review-pr
Forensic, stage-aware pull request review. Reconstructs the commit narrative, tests architectural premises against project reality, detects over-engineering, and produces a ready-to-post review comment. Use when the user says "review PR", "review this PR", "review PR #N", "is this PR ready to merge", "review the…