Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add saski/arnesto --skill launching-agent-teamsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saski/arnestoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/launching-agent-teams)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/launching-agent-teams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saski/arnesto/launching-agent-teams/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/launching-agent-teams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saski/arnesto/launching-agent-teams.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01158 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00579 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00232 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00116 |
Grade B, and why
launching-agent-teams scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
Agent teams are experimental. The user must have this in their settings (`~/.claude/settings.json` or `.claude/settings.json`): This is a copy
100% identical to launching-agent-teams — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
STARTER_CHARACTER = 🚀👥
Setup
Update reference docs to get the latest from Anthropic:
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/update-docs.py
Prerequisites
Agent teams are experimental. The user must have this in their settings (~/.claude/settings.json or .claude/settings.json):
{
"env": {
"CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS": "1"
}
}
If the flag isn't set, tell the user and offer to add it before proceeding.
Teams vs Subagents — Pick the Right Tool
Before launching a team, confirm it's the right approach:
Use agent teams when:
- Teammates need to communicate with each other
- Work benefits from debate, challenge, or cross-pollination
- Tasks span multiple independent areas (frontend/backend/tests)
- Investigation needs competing hypotheses
Use subagents instead when:
- Workers just report results back (no inter-agent communication)
- Tasks are focused and self-contained
- You want lower token cost
- Sequential dependency between steps
Use git worktrees when:
- You want manual parallel sessions without automated coordination
If the task fits subagents better, say so and offer that instead.
Launching a Team
1. Clarify the Work
Before spawning anything, understand:
- What's the goal?
- What are the independent pieces?
- What would each teammate own?
2. Decompose Into Roles
Each teammate should own a distinct, non-overlapping area. Overlap causes file conflicts and wasted tokens.
Aim for 3-5 teammates. More than that creates coordination overhead that rarely pays off. Each teammate should have 5-6 tasks to stay productive.
Anti-patterns:
- Two teammates editing the same file
- A teammate with only one small task (just do it yourself)
- Roles so broad they inevitably overlap
3. Size Tasks Appropriately
- Too small: coordination overhead exceeds the benefit
- Too large: teammates work too long without check-ins
- Right size: self-contained units with a clear deliverable (a function, a test file, a review document)
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 144 lines · 35 tokens per session scan B 79f6b2de8771
launching-agent-teams is a skill published in the GitHub repository saski/arnesto (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Unlicense. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,158 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). It is 100% identical to launching-agent-teams, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
work-state-and-delivery
Use when designing or reconciling design docs, task boards, external trackers, execution plans, delivery records, handoffs, review evidence, task-to-change traceability, or repository commit-coupling policy.
flowai-live-dashboard-template
Team-management dashboard skill in the FlowAI aesthetic — three tabs (Team Members, Team Details, Activity Log), KPI stat row, member table, role distribution bar chart, online presence and activity sparklines, and a top-contributors panel, all in a single self-contained HTML file with light/dark theming, hoverable…
team-okrs
OKR tracker page — quarter banner, three objectives with their key results as progress bars, owner avatars, status pills, and a "this quarter at a glance" sidebar. Use when the brief mentions "OKRs", "key results", "objectives", or "目标".
huashu-keynote-black
OpenDesign's all-hands: the year in review, the three priorities, and what every team owns next quarter. Built as a decision-grade corporate strategy deck for whole company.
html-ppt-knowledge-arch-blueprint
OpenDesign's incident retro: the daemon-restart data bug, the root cause, the fix, and the systemic follow-ups. Built as a decision-grade product management deck for engineering, SRE, leadership.
ppt-keynote
An operating-model redesign for a scaling logistics firm — the diagnosis, the target model, and the transition roadmap. Built as a decision-grade consulting deck for client sponsor, ops leaders.