Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to saski/arnesto. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/saski/arnesto/main/.agents/skills/wiki-update/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saski/arnestoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/wiki-update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/saski/arnesto/wiki-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/saski/arnesto/wiki-update.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.01891 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00945 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
wiki-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Wiki Update — Sync Any Project to Your Wiki
You are distilling knowledge from the current project into the user's Obsidian wiki. This skill works from any project directory, not just the obsidian-wiki repo.
Before You Start
- Read
~/.obsidian-wiki/configto get:OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH— where the wiki livesOBSIDIAN_WIKI_REPO— where the obsidian-wiki repo is cloned (for reading other skills if needed)
- If
~/.obsidian-wiki/configdoesn't exist, tell the user to runbash setup.shfrom their obsidian-wiki repo first. - Read
$OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH/.manifest.jsonto check if this project has been synced before. - Read
$OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH/index.mdto know what the wiki already contains.
Step 1: Understand the Project
Figure out what this project is by scanning the current working directory:
README.md, docs/, any markdown files- Source structure (frameworks, languages, key abstractions)
package.json,pyproject.toml,go.mod,Cargo.tomlor whatever defines the project- Git log (focus on commit messages that signal decisions, not "fix typo" stuff)
- Claude memory files if they exist (
.claude/in the project)
Derive a clean project name from the directory name.
Step 2: Compute the Delta
Check .manifest.json for this project:
- First time? Full scan. Everything is new.
- Synced before? Look at
last_commit_synced. Only consider what changed since then. Usegit log <last_commit>..HEAD --onelineto see what's new.
If nothing meaningful changed since last sync, tell the user and stop.
Step 3: Decide What to Distill
This is the core question from Karpathy's pattern: what would you want to know about this project if you came back in 3 months with zero context?
Worth distilling:
- Architecture decisions and why they were made
- Patterns discovered while building (things you'd Google again otherwise)
- What tools, services, APIs the project depends on and how they're wired together
- Key abstractions, how they connect, what the mental model is
- Trade-offs that were evaluated, what was picked and why
- Things learned while building that aren't obvious from reading the code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 195 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 6022d5ccbba6
wiki-update is a skill published in the GitHub repository saski/arnesto (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed Unlicense. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 1,891 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-graphify-dark-graph
OpenDesign's feature business case for the plugin marketplace: the user pain, options, tradeoffs, and the measure of success. Built as a decision-grade product management deck for PM, eng, design, leadership.
work-state-and-delivery
Use when designing or reconciling design docs, task boards, external trackers, execution plans, delivery records, handoffs, review evidence, task-to-change traceability, or repository commit-coupling policy.
kami-landing
Produce a print-grade single-page kami (紙 / 纸) document — warm parchment canvas, ink-blue accent, serif at one weight, no italic, no cool grays. The output reads like a professional white paper or studio one-pager, not an app UI. Multilingual by design (EN · zh-CN · ja). One self-contained HTML file, zero dependencies.
clinical-case-report
Structured medical case presentation for clinical rounds, conferences, and documentation. Generates SOAP-format or narrative case reports with physiologically accurate vitals, labs, and evidence-based plans. Use when the brief mentions "case report", "case presentation", "SOAP note", "clinical case", "ward rounds"…
html-ppt-zhangzara-soft-editorial
A digital-transformation roadmap for a legacy insurer — the diagnosis, the sequenced bets, and the operating rhythm to land them. Built as a decision-grade consulting deck for client executives.
html-ppt-zhangzara-stencil-tablet
A workplace-safety compliance review for a manufacturing regulator — findings, the evidence chain, and the corrective mandate. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for regulator, plant leadership.