Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/main/.claude/skills/review-phase/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00144 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00058 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
review-phase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
review-phase
実装済みコードのレビューを行う。
必ず守ること
- 最初に必ず
.claude/skills/dev-workflow/SKILL.mdを Read する。記憶・推測で進めない - フェーズ E（レビュー） から実行する
.claude/skills/dev-workflow/SKILL.mdの AskUserQuestion・Edit・セッションファイル更新の手順を省略しない
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 5acd89f778b1
review-phase is a skill published in the GitHub repository satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 144 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review, two modes. Strategic Matrix v4.3 (MTA-004) for arguments/plans/decisions: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Summary. Deliverable Audit for built artefacts (assignments, reports, code outputs): isolated fresh-context hunt against the brief…
decision-journal
Unified decision lifecycle: Pre-decision logging, post-decision review, failure classification, and calibration tracking. Absorbs: post-mortem-engine.
Smart Code Review
Review a PR diff: triage its severity, then produce a depth-appropriate review with structured findings, fix suggestions, and a merge decision. Use for code review, review PR, and severity triage requests.
orchestrator
Providerneutrales Protokoll zum Zerlegen komplexer Aufgaben, zum Beauftragen unabhängiger Worker und zur evidenzbasierten Abnahme ihrer Ergebnisse.
incident-review
Summarize an incident with timeline, likely cause, impact, and follow-up actions.
compare-race
Use when the user wants to send the same prompt to several LLMs and compare the answers - sequentially (stopwatch, clean per-lane timing) or in parallel (true race), with optional repetitions per model, judged by the starting model across quality, correctness, completeness, instruction fidelity and latency (time is…