Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/main/.claude/skills/review-phase/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/review-phase.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00144 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00072 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
review-phase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
review-phase
実装済みコードのレビューを行う。
必ず守ること
- 最初に必ず
.claude/skills/dev-workflow/SKILL.mdを Read する。記憶・推測で進めない - フェーズ E（レビュー） から実行する
.claude/skills/dev-workflow/SKILL.mdの AskUserQuestion・Edit・セッションファイル更新の手順を省略しない
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 14 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 5acd89f778b1
review-phase is a skill published in the GitHub repository satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 144 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review: v4.3 Strategic Matrix (MTA-004). 7-phase framework: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA Decision Engine → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Executive Summary. Absorbs: bias-detector.
decision-journal
Unified decision lifecycle: Pre-decision logging, post-decision review, failure classification, and calibration tracking. Absorbs: post-mortem-engine.
Smart Code Review
Review a PR diff: triage its severity, then produce a depth-appropriate review with structured findings, fix suggestions, and a merge decision. Use for code review, review PR, and severity triage requests.
incident-review
Summarize an incident with timeline, likely cause, impact, and follow-up actions.
arize-annotation
INVOKE THIS SKILL when creating, managing, or using annotation configs or annotation queues on Arize (categorical, continuous, freeform), or applying human annotations to project spans via the Python SDK. Configs are the label schema for human feedback; queues are review workflows that route records to annotators.…
orchestrator
Providerneutrales Protokoll zum Zerlegen komplexer Aufgaben, zum Beauftragen unabhängiger Worker und zur evidenzbasierten Abnahme ihrer Ergebnisse.