Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/main/.claude/skills/start/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/start)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor/start.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.02555 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01277 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00511 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00255 |
Grade A, and why
start scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
start
開発ワークフローの入口。フロー順序: セッション初期化ガード(最優先)→ Step 0(レポート整理)→ Step 1(開始地点選択)→ Step 2(フェーズ遷移)。
ワークフローは 2 つだけ:
- 標準ワークフロー: ヒアリング → 設計 → 計画 → 実装(TDD) → レビュー → 指摘ありで計画へ戻る、なしで終了
- デバッグワークフロー: systematic-debugger → 実装(developer + tester Green) → レビュー → 指摘ありで標準ワークフローの計画へ、なしで終了
その他の単発タスク(ドキュメント作成など)は対応する個別コマンド(例: /doc)を直接使う。
最優先: セッション初期化ガード(Step 0 より前に必ず実行)
本体(Step 0 以降)に入る前に、当該セッションで /init-session が実行済みかを判定し、未実行なら自動実行する。
Bash で判定する:
c3 run .claude/skills/init-session/scripts/session_guard.py check
INIT_DONE(フラグの中身が現在のCLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_IDと一致)→ 既に初期化済み。そのまま Step 0 へ進む。INIT_NEEDED(不一致 / フラグ不在 /CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_IDが空)→ Skill ツールでinit-sessionをfrom-start引数付きで呼ぶ。init-sessionが(必要なら/setupを連鎖実行し)前回状態を復元し、init_session.flagを書く。from-start付きのためinit-session側は開始方法の選択(Step 4)や陳腐化タスク確認などの対話プロンプトをスキップして復元サマリのみ提示する。init-sessionの Skill 実行が完了したら本スキルに戻り、続けて Step 0(レポート整理)以降を実行する。
ループ回避:
init-sessionは本体開始直後にinit_session.flagを現セッション ID で書く。そのためinit-session(Step 5「ワークフローで始める」)が/startを呼び戻しても、本ガードはINIT_DONEと判定し再帰呼び出ししない。
Step 0: レポートの整理
Glob で .claude/reports/*.md を検索する(archive/ 配下は含まない)。
レポートが存在しない場合はこの Step をスキップして Step 1 へ進む。
レポートが存在する場合はファイル名の一覧をテキストで提示してから AskUserQuestion で確認する:
{
"questions": [{
"question": "既存のレポートがあります。どうしますか?",
"options": [
{ "label": "全てアーカイブして新しく始める", "description": "全レポートを reports/archive/ に移動する" },
{ "label": "アーカイブするフェーズを選ぶ", "description": "フェーズ単位で選んで一部だけ移動する" },
{ "label": "そのまま引き継ぐ", "description": "レポートを変更せずに続ける" }
]
}]
}
アーカイブは専用スクリプトが行う。このコマンドは、移動先に同名のファイルが既にある場合は
移動元を {元の名前}-archived-{元ファイルの更新時刻}.md へリネームして両方を残す(既存ファイルは 1 バイトも変更しない)。
アーカイブ先ディレクトリが無ければ作成する。移動できなかったファイルがあれば stderr に一覧を出して exit 1 になる。
「全てアーカイブして新しく始める」の場合: Bash ツールで実行する:
c3 run .claude/skills/start/scripts/archive_reports.py
「アーカイブするフェーズを選ぶ」の場合: AskUserQuestion で対象フェーズを確認する:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 167 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 9c0d008da373
start is a skill published in the GitHub repository satoh-y-0323/claude-code-conductor (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 2,555 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
maple
MAPLE AI Development Squad — install the full skill set for multi-agent development workflows: pipeline-runner, tdd-workflow, playwright-cli, github-cli, mermaid-diagrams, and more. Designed for Claude Code, OpenCode, and GitHub Copilot.
sparc-methodology
SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration.
tdd-agent
Autonomous test-driven development agent that writes code to make tests pass.
tdd-workflow
Drive implementation through a test-first loop: write a failing test, make it pass with the simplest change, then refactor under a green suite. Use when the user asks for TDD or test-driven development, wants tests written before the code, is adding behaviour to code that has tests, is fixing a bug and wants a…
absolute-work
End-to-end, phase-gated SDLC for AI coding agents: relentless design interview → reviewed spec → dependency-graphed task board → safe-wave TDD execution → verification → converge. Handles features, bugs, refactors, greenfield projects, planning breakdowns, and migrations. Triggers on "absolute work", "build this…
test-writing
Writes meaningful tests that actually catch bugs.