Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sazardev/networking-with-go. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sazardev/networking-with-go/master/.opencode/skills/review-frontend/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sazardev/networking-with-goWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sazardev/networking-with-go/review-frontend)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sazardev/networking-with-go/review-frontend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sazardev/networking-with-go/review-frontend/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sazardev/networking-with-go/review-frontend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sazardev/networking-with-go/review-frontend.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.01072 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00429 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00214 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
review-frontend scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 1e72ac2cdc07
review-frontend is a skill published in the GitHub repository sazardev/networking-with-go (61 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 1,072 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
seven-question-gate
7-question gate run before promoting a finding to FINDING + opening a report. Kills weak/non-impactful findings before they reach the report stage and damage validity ratio.
find-security-vulnerabilities-in-code
Find security vulnerabilities in a codebase or repository with Strix — a white-box AI security review that reads your source, reasons about the actual data flow and authorization model, then exploits what it finds in a live sandbox so every reported issue has a working proof-of-concept instead of a noisy…
code-review-specialist
Comprehensive code review with security, performance, and quality analysis. Use when users ask to review code, analyze code quality, evaluate pull requests, or mention code review, security analysis, or performance optimization.
ti-ioc-extraction
Automated IOC extraction from threat reports, logs, and unstructured text — parse hashes, IPs, domains, URLs, email addresses, and CVEs. Covers regex-based extraction, defanging/refanging, bulk hash lookup, IOC deduplication, YARA rule generation from IOCs, and STIX/TAXII formatting for sharing.
ti-yara-hunting
YARA rule writing from behavioral observations and TI report analysis — sample-to-rule conversion, condition optimization, performance tuning, and retrohunting on VirusTotal and ANY.RUN. Covers YARA/YARA-X syntax, yarGen automated generation, and production rule deployment.
m365-mailbox-compromise
Microsoft 365 mailbox compromise chain — OAuth consent phishing, delegate access abuse, mail rule persistence, and token theft via device code phishing. Full kill chain from initial access to persistent email collection.