Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add scholarly360/owasp-top10-web-skills --skill authentication-failuresgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/scholarly360/owasp-top10-web-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/scholarly360/owasp-top10-web-skills/authentication-failures)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/scholarly360/owasp-top10-web-skills/authentication-failures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/scholarly360/owasp-top10-web-skills/authentication-failures/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/scholarly360/owasp-top10-web-skills/authentication-failures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/scholarly360/owasp-top10-web-skills/authentication-failures.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00166 | $0.02275 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00083 | $0.01137 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00455 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
authentication-failures scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 244 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Authentication Failures — OWASP A07:2025
Rank: #7 (stable) | CWEs covered: 36 | Occurrences: 1.1 million+
New 2025 threat: Hybrid password attacks / password spray — attackers increment
leaked credentials (e.g., Password1! → Password2!).
What This Skill Covers
Authentication Failures occur when an application's identity verification mechanisms are absent, weak, or bypassable. Key attack patterns:
- Credential stuffing / brute force — automated login attempts using leaked creds
- Weak/default passwords — accounts created with guessable or known-breached passwords
- Insecure credential recovery — password reset flows that leak information or are bypassable
- Missing or bypassed MFA — no second factor, or MFA that can be skipped
- Exposed session identifiers — tokens in URLs, logs, or referrer headers
- Session fixation — attacker sets a known session ID before authentication
- Improper session invalidation — sessions that survive logout or token revocation
Testing Checklist for FastAPI & Flask
Work through each section systematically. Mark ✓ pass, ✗ fail, N/A where not applicable.
1. JWT Implementation
# ✓ GOOD — short-lived tokens, claim validation
token = jwt.encode(
{"sub": user_id, "exp": datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(minutes=15),
"iss": "myapp", "aud": "myapp-client"},
settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithm="HS256"
)
jwt.decode(token, settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithms=["HS256"],
audience="myapp-client", issuer="myapp")
# ✗ BAD — no expiry, no claim validation, accepts any algorithm
jwt.decode(token, settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithms=["HS256", "RS256", "none"])
Checks:
- Access tokens expire in 15–30 minutes
- Refresh tokens rotate on use and are invalidated on logout
-
aud(audience) andiss(issuer) claims are set AND verified on decode - Algorithm is pinned to an explicit list — never include
"none" - JWT secret loaded from
os.environ, minimum 32 characters - Algorithm confusion attack prevented: RS256 keys never accepted as HS256 secrets
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 244 lines · 166 tokens per session scan A f661af3164ac
authentication-failures is a skill published in the GitHub repository scholarly360/owasp-top10-web-skills (22 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 166 tokens to every session and 2,275 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Web Application Security Testing
OWASP Top 10 testing, injection vulnerability detection, API security assessment, authentication testing, and web vulnerability reporting for authorized assessments.
saferskills
Use SaferSkills to find, evaluate, and safely install AI agent capabilities (skills, MCP servers, hooks, plugins, rules) and to assess a whole agent. Run this before you install, add, recommend, or trust any capability — or when asked whether one is safe or what its score is: scan and score it first with npx…
content-cadence
Pipeline for turning one R&D artefact (PR, PoC, analysis) into one public post — briefing or deep dive — plus a social derivative where the overlay scopes one in. Triggers when an R&D output is ready to become content, or when drafting any blog post for the site. Enforces the anonymisation gate and repo editorial…
evm
Help users answer one question: "Are we on track?" using Earned Value Management metrics. This skill replaces gut-feel status reporting and traffic-light dashboards with four computed numbers (SV, SPI, CV, CPI) that tell you exactly where a project stands — in schedule and in budget — at any point in time.
tco
Help users answer one question: "What will this actually cost?" using Total Cost of Ownership analysis. This skill replaces sticker-price comparisons with lifetime cost calculations that include maintenance, operations, time value of money, and residual value.
montecarlo
Help users answer one question: "What's the probability we finish by this date?" using Monte Carlo schedule simulation. This skill replaces single-point PERT estimates with full probability distributions over project duration.