review

review is a skill for Claude Code from scolladon/craft. It costs 31 tokens per session (1,281 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A multi-part code-review procedure that checks a branch across areas such as code quality, security, tests, and performance.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review the current branch, identify issues across several dimensions, and apply the resulting fixes.
Why use it?
It gathers separate review perspectives and repeats checks until the remaining findings meet the chosen convergence rules.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} variable.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the craft plugin — 20 skills, 4 commands, 9 agents, 1 hook shipped together

Good fit Use it to review the current branch, identify issues across several dimensions…

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add scolladon/craft
Claude Code
/plugin install craft

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install craft, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 20 skills, 4 commands, 9 agents, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/scolladon/craft/review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/scolladon/craft/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/scolladon/craft/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/scolladon/craft/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,281 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.01281
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00641
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00256
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00128

Measured 6d ago against content hash 6ff1c45bcc7c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/review/SKILL.md · 76 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

craft:review

Preamble (always runs — non-overridable)

  1. Manifest read (lint if standalone). Standalone: scope = current branch vs default branch; establish global-context preconditions (checkout root).
  2. Probe harness knobs from phase.harness (the resolved descriptor the orchestrator holds for this phase), each with a strong fallback when the knob is absent: dimensions (default code, security, tests, perf — a repo context: may refine their definitions); passes = reviewers per dimension (default 1); max_cycles (default 3); convergence (default low-only). Gates as in implementation's preamble; gates.review-batch optional extra.
  3. Memory read/write surface (advisory). READS: recurring findings entries as advisory watch-items — prepended to each reviewer spawn's injected block so reviewers check these locations first. A cached finding pre-empts re-discovery effort; it never replaces the full-diff review. WRITES (buffered to run record, flushed at run end): findings that recurred this run, keyed by file + pattern, with severity. file MUST be stored repo-RELATIVE (strip the repoRoot prefix) — never an absolute path, which would leak $HOME/username into the committed store. Per ADR-123 whitelist: no provenance refs, no code snippets, no prose explanation body, no PII. RETRACTS: the run retracts a findings entry when it re-checked that entry's own file + pattern at that location and the pattern is absent — a mechanical re-check, never a judgment call, and only for the concern this phase owns. Emit MEMORY-RETRACT(findings): <file> <pattern>, file repo-RELATIVE under the same rule the WRITES clause states above.

Procedure (default body — a manifest override: replaces everything below)

  1. Round 1 — full scope: fan out exactly phase.harness.reviewPlan.passes read-only craft:reviewer per dimension in parallel (one message, dimensions.length × reviewPlan.passes spawns). This count is engine-emitted and binding — the walk MUST spawn exactly that many reviewers per dimension, no more, no fewer. A resolved product above eight also lands an advisory record in the run record — it never changes this count. Each carries: its dimension + definition; the working directory; the diff scope; the design doc path (if any); global + review-phase context: files verbatim. Perf calibrates to the diff — zero findings legitimate. Tests dimension: do NOT run the executing-harness techniques (a dedicated phase owns it) — but suspected-benign harness findings MAY be flagged as advisory notes (keep them for the validation phase).
  2. Normalize findings: before applying, pipe each reviewer's raw output through node "${CRAFT_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}}/engine/bin/normalize-findings.js" to obtain a canonical Finding[] ({file, line, severity, finding, fix?, status?}). Key on these fields — never on whether the reviewer emitted a JSON array or a per-line list.
  3. Fixes — session-owned: the actionable set is status ∈ {absent, VERIFIED, SUSPECT, PROBE} — engage each of these exactly as today (apply the fix, or investigate and either fix it or record it as RULED-OUT). RULED-OUT is record-only: write it to the run record as "examined, not a defect" and drop it from the fix set. Apply every accepted actionable finding yourself, batched per dimension; each batch gates on the targeted checks (gates.part over touched files) + gates.review-batch before its conventional commit (e.g. refactor(<scope>): apply code-review fixes); gates.phase after the round.
  4. Converge per dimension, up to max_cycles cycles (default 3), per phase.harness.reviewPlan.stop_rule (engine-emitted, binding). Both rules below count only actionable findings (Step 3) — a RULED-OUT record never blocks convergence:
    • low-only → converged once only LOW-severity actionable findings remain; NO relaunch.
    • none → no convergence loop; single pass only.
    • non-low-count<=<n> → stop when the count of remaining non-LOW actionable findings (severity ≥ MEDIUM, off the normalized Finding[]) is ≤ n. The threshold n is read directly from the rule string — no re-derivation. MEDIUM+ → fresh reviewer scoped to the FIX DELTA only (prior findings + fix commits' diff; mission: verify resolutions + review the fix diff). The prior-findings payload carries RULED-OUT records too, labelled: do not re-raise a RULED-OUT claim unless the fix diff reintroduces the condition. This threaded payload is a bounded, status-tagged findings-state, never an accumulated transcript. Fresh agent each cycle — never continue a reviewer.
  5. Security gate: HIGH/CRITICAL security findings — show the user the fix diff BEFORE committing. Everything else: fix-all-then-converge, no user round-trip.
  6. Record per-dimension outcomes in the run record.

Read the full file on GitHub · 76 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 76 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 6ff1c45bcc7c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a skill published in the GitHub repository scolladon/craft (2 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,281 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

link-check

Verify @file references in AIWG skills and agents against the linking contract — per-file or corpus-wide, with optional auto-fix.

jmagly/aiwg · 29 tokens

great_cto

Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.

avelikiy/great_cto · 32 tokens

vertical-real-estate

Residential-proptech domain knowledge so architect / pm aren't naive when speccing real-estate products (listings, lead-crm, transaction-coordination, property-mgmt). Codifies MLS/IDX reality, listing status lifecycle + syndication canonical-source, long-cycle lead nurture, transaction-coordination as the high-pain…

avelikiy/great_cto · 99 tokens

product-economics

Does this product make money at a price someone will pay? Forces contribution margin, a price with a stated basis, and a bottom-up market size — each number labelled measured / assumed / unknown, so a guess can never be read as a calculation.

avelikiy/great_cto · 55 tokens

anti-patterns

Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that greatcto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect (pre-impl), pm (planning), senior-dev (impl), l3-support (post-incident).

avelikiy/great_cto · 59 tokens

migration-ready-schema

Data-model rules that make a schema importable from day one, so the migration-import-engineer is never blocked on missing columns. Every SMB Product-Builder product must let a customer bring their data from an incumbent (ServiceTitan/Toast/Mindbody/Shopify) — that requires provenance (sourceref) and rollback…

avelikiy/great_cto · 133 tokens