post-dev-test

post-dev-test is a skill for Claude Code from sd0xdev/sd0x-harness. It costs 55 tokens per session (1,438 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A post-development testing workflow for checking whether a completed feature has enough integration or end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests check a feature through its full user-facing flow.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after feature development to inspect coverage, add missing integration or end-to-end tests, and run the relevant tests.
Why use it?
It addresses the gap between having unit tests and knowing that connected parts of the feature work together without regressions.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions Codex.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is import { ITestRequester, createRequester } from '../../createRequester';.

Part of the sd0x-dev-flow plugin — 101 skills, 16 agents, 5 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it after feature development to inspect coverage, add missing integration or end-to-end tests, and run the relevant tests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/post-dev-test

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install sd0x-dev-flow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 101 skills, 16 agents, 5 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for post-dev-test

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/post-dev-test/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/post-dev-test)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/post-dev-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/post-dev-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for post-dev-test

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/post-dev-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/post-dev-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,438 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.01438
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00575
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00288
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00144

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 28d3c635d976, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

post-dev-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/post-dev-test/SKILL.md · 178 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 178 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Post-Dev Test Skill

Trigger

  • Keywords: add tests, integration test, e2e test, test coverage, post dev test

When to Use

  • After completing feature development, before /precommit
  • Want to ensure new features have sufficient integration/e2e coverage
  • Unit tests exist, but higher-level tests are missing

Key Rule: Must Execute on Changes

Even if test coverage looks complete, tests must be executed whenever there are code changes.

Scenario Action
Code changes exist Must execute related integration/e2e
Tests exist and are complete Still execute to confirm no regression
Tests missing or insufficient Write then execute
Pure doc/comment changes Can skip

Reason: Test coverage does not equal tests passing. Existing tests may fail due to code changes.

When NOT to Use

  • Only need unit tests (use /codex-test-gen)
  • Review existing tests (use /codex-test-review)
  • Still in development (complete /feature-dev flow first)

Workflow

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: Analyze Context                                        │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. From conversation history: what feature was developed?       │
│ 2. Identify involved Service / Provider / Controller            │
│ 3. List core flows and API endpoints                            │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 2: Check Existing Test Coverage                           │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Search test/integration/ for related tests                   │
│ 2. Search test/e2e/ for related tests                           │
│ 3. Assess coverage gaps                                         │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 3: Determine Test Strategy                                │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌──────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────┐   │
│ │ Change Type  │ Test Requirement                           │   │
│ ├──────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────┤   │
│ │ New API      │ Integration test (Controller + Service)    │   │
│ │ New Service  │ Integration test (Service layer)           │   │
│ │ Cross-svc    │ E2E test (complete flow)                   │   │
│ │ DB operation │ Integration test (actual DB)               │   │
│ │ External API │ Integration test (mock external)           │   │
│ └──────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────┘   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 4: Write Tests                                            │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Reference existing test patterns                             │
│ 2. Use {FRAMEWORK_MOCK_LIB} createApp / createRequester        │
│ 3. Follow TEST_ENV environment variable conventions             │
│ 4. Write to corresponding directory                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 5: Execute Verification                                   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Execute newly added tests                                    │
│ 2. Confirm passing                                              │
│ 3. Report results                                               │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Read the full file on GitHub · 178 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 178 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 28d3c635d976

Subscribe to this mod's changes

post-dev-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository sd0xdev/sd0x-harness (194 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,438 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

building

Use when writing production code test-first: the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle, false-RED detection, vertical slicing, scope escalation, test process discipline, and code generation patterns.

romiluz13/cc10x · 43 tokens

verify-qa

A conditional end-to-end quality-assurance workflow for changes to a user interface. End-to-end testing checks a feature through the whole user path, often in a real browser, and this workflow also includes performance and accessibility checks.

easyinplay/harnessed · 131 tokens

ui-validate

A collection of independent checks for validating web interfaces. It measures visual hierarchy and accessibility, checks motion rules, detects visual drift across screens, tests common viewport sizes, and captures evidence for specified test cases.

kimsanguine/hplan · 112 tokens

playwright-patterns

Use when writing Playwright automation code, building web scrapers, or creating E2E tests - provides best practices for selector strategies, waiting patterns, and robust automation that minimizes flakiness.

ed3dai/ed3d-plugins · 43 tokens

ios-test

Build, launch, and visually test iOS/SwiftUI apps in the Simulator using computer use. Automated screen navigation, crash log analysis, state testing (empty/error/loading), and memory leak detection. Use when you need to test an iOS app, run it in the Simulator, check for crashes, or verify UI flows.

yusufkaran/swiftui-autotest-skill · 69 tokens

swiftui-autotest-skill

AI-powered visual testing and accessibility setup for iOS/SwiftUI apps. Build, launch in Simulator, test with computer use, detect crashes, analyze memory leaks, and add accessibility identifiers — all from the terminal.

yusufkaran/swiftui-autotest-skill · 51 tokens