Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/remindnpx skills add sd0xdev/sd0x-harness --skill remindgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sd0xdev/sd0x-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/remind)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/remind"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/remind.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00157 | $0.06166 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00078 | $0.03083 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00617 |
Grade A, and why
remind scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 384 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Remind — Lightweight Model Correction
Detect what rules or steps the model forgot, auto-load the relevant rule files, and execute the correction immediately. Think of this as a "conscience check" that reads the actual rules rather than relying on memory.
⚠️ CRITICAL: Execute, Don't Report
/remind is an executor, not a reporter. After detecting a violation:
- Output the findings table (for traceability)
- Invoke the correction command via Skill tool in the same reply — e.g.,
Skill: /codex-review-doc - Do NOT stop after outputting findings
| Prohibited | Correct |
|---|---|
| ❌ "要執行 /codex-review-doc 嗎？" | ✅ Output findings → immediately invoke /codex-review-doc |
| ❌ Output table then stop | ✅ Output table → invoke correction Skill → report result |
| ❌ "建議執行..." / "Next step: run..." | ✅ Execute the correction, don't suggest it |
| ❌ Ask user for permission | ✅ Auto-loop rules mandate execution without permission |
There are exactly three exceptions, and § Step 4 defines them. They are not enumerated here: this file already learned that a second copy of the lifecycle diverges from the first within a round, so the copies were removed rather than kept in sync. What belongs here is the part § Step 4 does not carry — every executable owed correction is invoked, and "owed" is plural: two findings means two invocations.
Trigger
- Keywords: remind, forgot, check rules, what did I miss, you forgot to, re-read rules, drift, correction
- User suspects model skipped a required step or ignored a rule
- User explicitly says "你忘了做什麼" or similar
When NOT to Use
| Scenario | Alternative |
|---|---|
| Full code review | /codex-review-fast |
| What to do next | /next-step |
| Workflow progression | /feature-dev |
| Adversarial debate | /codex-brainstorm |
Modes
| Mode | Trigger | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| Smart detect | /remind (no args) |
Checker, else fenced git → detect violations → auto-load relevant rules |
| Specific rule | /remind auto-loop |
Read rules/auto-loop.md → summarize + check violations |
| Nuclear | /remind --all |
Read CLAUDE.md + ALL rules → full compliance report |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 384 lines · 157 tokens per session scan A 80f8866d35d5
remind is a skill published in the GitHub repository sd0xdev/sd0x-harness (188 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 157 tokens to every session and 6,166 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
cc10x-router
THE ONLY ENTRY POINT FOR CC10X. Activate this skill for build, debug, review, and plan requests. Use when the user asks to implement, fix, review, plan, test, refactor, or continue code work. Trigger keywords: build, implement, create, write, add, review, audit, debug, fix, error, bug, broken, plan, design, architect…
building
Implementation skill for writing production code with TDD. Covers the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle, false-RED detection, vertical slicing, scope escalation, test process discipline, and code generation patterns. Loaded by component-builder and bug-investigator.
diff-driven-docs
Use when a BUILD phase completes, a commit is staged, or a PR is about to be created, and the diff has not yet been reflected in documentation. Also use when the user says "update docs", "sync docs", "document this", or asks whether documentation is up to date.
exploration
Two-mode exploration skill: (1) design dialogue — turn rough ideas into validated designs through collaborative interview before planning; (2) spike — throwaway code answering ONE design question, deleted or absorbed, never shipped. Router invokes mode via dispatch context.
memory-and-handoff
Two-mode skill: (1) session memory — load/persist durable workflow state under .cc10x/ (activeContext, patterns, progress) so context survives compaction; (2) handoff package — portable, secrets-redacted export for a coworker, different tool, or fresh non-cc10x session.
plan-review-gate
Use after saving a non-trivial plan or decision RFC when a fail-closed feasibility, completeness, and alignment review must block execution.