sdcorejs-review

sdcorejs-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from sdcorejs/sdcorejs-agent. It costs 83 tokens per session (6,317 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only review and audit workflow for software projects and related product or design work. It checks implementation, ownership, security, evidence, requirements coverage, and the validity of generated or referenced material.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review code, architecture, security, performance, accessibility, product documents, designs, tests, documentation, workflows, and other supported project artifacts.
Why use it?
It provides a structured way to find defects, missing evidence, security risks, accessibility issues, and gaps between decisions, tasks, and results. It does not change the files it reviews.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sdcorejs/sdcorejs-agent/sdcorejs-review
Any agent
npx skills add sdcorejs/sdcorejs-agent --skill sdcorejs-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sdcorejs/sdcorejs-agent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for sdcorejs-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sdcorejs/sdcorejs-agent/sdcorejs-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sdcorejs/sdcorejs-agent/sdcorejs-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sdcorejs/sdcorejs-agent/sdcorejs-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sdcorejs/sdcorejs-agent/sdcorejs-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 83 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 6,317 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00083 $0.06317
Opus 5 $0.00042 $0.03159
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.01263
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00632

Measured 4d ago against content hash 5fd200c06259, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

sdcorejs-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/sdcorejs-review/SKILL.md · 496 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 496 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review (profile + dimension aware)

Purpose

One read-only review skill for code, architecture, security, performance, and accessibility. It classifies both track and track_profile before loading track-specific references so plain Angular, NestJS, Next.js, and general projects are not reviewed against SDCoreJS framework conventions they do not use.

sdcorejs-review must not edit source code. Direct user-requested review is strict read-only by default and must not silently write .sdcorejs artifacts or auto-run sdcorejs-repair-loop. Repair belongs to sdcorejs-repair-loop after an explicit user or finish-gate choice.

Resolve track and its durable review_profile from _refs/shared/system-registry.json, then validate context/findings with _refs/shared/review-contract.mjs. Do not maintain a separate first-class track enum in this skill.

Shared Protocols

Read _refs/shared/runtime-protocols.md. Apply _refs/shared/artifact-lifecycle.md only when the user explicitly chooses to persist the report. Read _refs/shared/decision-coverage.md; preserve decision_coverage and goal_backward_review, and report drift, missing task or evidence mappings, invariant gaps, or unresolved critique blockers without renumbering or repairing the approved records. Preserve architecture_context and the exact conditional gate from the approved plan. Architecture review compares changed boundaries, ownership, public contracts, profile blocks, and validation evidence with approved INV-*; a stale/missing/mutated required context is a finding, never permission to rewrite architecture or conventions. Read _refs/shared/validation-map.md; preserve the approved validation_map and report drift from mapped cases or current evidence without rewriting rows.

When to use

  • After a track executor finishes a batch and the finish gate selected review.
  • Before merging a feature branch.
  • User says "review code", "security review", "performance review", "review a11y", "architecture review", "comprehensive audit", "full review", "scored review", or localized equivalents.

Read the full file on GitHub · 496 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 496 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 5fd200c06259

Subscribe to this mod's changes

sdcorejs-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository sdcorejs/sdcorejs-agent (2 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 6,317 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens