sf-google-quality-content

sf-google-quality-content is a skill for Codex from Search-Foundry/sf-ai-skills. It costs 113 tokens per session (1,666 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A guide for creating or reviewing search-focused editorial content using Google’s Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines. It covers useful content, trust, first-hand experience, expertise, and handling topics that can affect people’s health, money, or safety.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for blog posts, landing pages, guides, product or category pages, FAQs, and content plans. It helps define the audience and search intent, gather supporting evidence, and apply quality and anti-spam checks.
Why use it?
It helps prevent content that is thin, untrustworthy, misleading, or written only to manipulate search rankings. It also sets a higher evidence standard for sensitive topics.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present.

Good fit Use it for blog posts, landing pages, guides, product or category pages, FAQs, and content plans. It helps define the audience and search intent, gather supporting evidence, and apply quality and anti-spam checks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/search-foundry/sf-ai-skills/sf-google-quality-content
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Search-Foundry/sf-ai-skills --skill sf-google-quality-content
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Search-Foundry/sf-ai-skills

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for sf-google-quality-content

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/search-foundry/sf-ai-skills/sf-google-quality-content/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/search-foundry/sf-ai-skills/sf-google-quality-content)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/search-foundry/sf-ai-skills/sf-google-quality-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/search-foundry/sf-ai-skills/sf-google-quality-content/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for sf-google-quality-content

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/search-foundry/sf-ai-skills/sf-google-quality-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/search-foundry/sf-ai-skills/sf-google-quality-content.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 113 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,666 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00113 $0.01666
Opus 5 $0.00056 $0.00833
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00333
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00167

Measured 12d ago against content hash 1225117e304f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

sf-google-quality-content scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/content/sf-google-quality-content/SKILL.md · 139 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

SF Google Quality Content

Use this skill to produce or audit SEO/editorial content that is genuinely helpful, trustworthy, and aligned with Google QRG.

Language mode

  • Default to Italian if the user writes in Italian.
  • Default to English if the user writes in English.
  • If the target market is specified, adapt language, examples, and terminology to that market.
  • Preserve the same quality controls in both languages.

Workflow (EN)

1) Frame the task before writing

  • Define audience, locale, funnel stage, and business goal.
  • Define the query intent cluster: informational, transactional, navigational, local, mixed.
  • State the page purpose in one sentence.
  • Classify YMYL risk (none, moderate, high) and required trust threshold.

2) Build the evidence base

  • Collect source facts, first-hand signals, and brand-owned proof points.
  • Mark each key claim with a source type: first-party data, expert statement, primary source, secondary source.
  • If claims are sensitive (health, finance, legal, civic), require high-confidence sourcing and clear attribution.

3) Define E-E-A-T strategy (explicitly)

  • Experience: add direct use, lived context, tests, real cases, or operational details.
  • Expertise: show qualified knowledge level needed for topic risk.
  • Authoritativeness: connect to recognized entities, references, or track record.
  • Trust: prioritize accuracy, transparency, edit quality, and absence of deception.
  • For YMYL content, trust and correctness are mandatory gates, not optional enhancements.

4) Produce the content

  • Write for the dominant intent first; cover secondary intents only if they help users.
  • Use clear information hierarchy: answer first, then depth, then supporting detail.
  • Prefer concrete examples, comparisons, and practical steps over generic prose.
  • Separate facts, interpretation, and opinion.
  • Declare uncertainties and limits when present.

5) Run the quality gate (required)

  • Reject content if it appears mass-produced, derivative, or with little added value.
  • Reject content with sensational, misleading, or manipulative framing.
  • Reject content missing who-is-responsible signals when needed (author/site accountability).
  • Reject YMYL content with mild inaccuracies or weak trust signals.
  • Check ads/monetization and UX do not obstruct main content comprehension.

Read the full file on GitHub · 139 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 139 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 1225117e304f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

sf-google-quality-content is a skill published in the GitHub repository Search-Foundry/sf-ai-skills (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 1,666 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens