git-workflow-and-versioning

git-workflow-and-versioning is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skills. It costs 28 tokens per session (3,375 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of git-workflow-and-versioning, MIT.

A set of rules for organizing Git changes, branches, releases, version numbers, and changelogs.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps with commits, branching, conflict resolution, release preparation, version bumps, tags, and changelog writing.
Why use it?
It makes changes easier to review, undo, merge, and explain to other developers.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is git worktree add ../project-feature-a feature/task-creation.

Good fit It helps with commits, branching, conflict resolution, release preparation, version bumps, tags, and changelog writing.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skills
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/git-workflow-and-versioning

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for git-workflow-and-versioning

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/git-workflow-and-versioning/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/git-workflow-and-versioning)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/git-workflow-and-versioning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/git-workflow-and-versioning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for git-workflow-and-versioning

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/git-workflow-and-versioning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/git-workflow-and-versioning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,375 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.03375
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.01688
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00675
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00337

Measured 3d ago against content hash 43b28183211d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

git-workflow-and-versioning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to git-workflow-and-versioning — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

openclaw-skills/git-workflow-and-versioning/SKILL.md · 368 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 368 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Git Workflow and Versioning

Overview

Git is your safety net. Treat commits as save points, branches as sandboxes, and history as documentation. With AI agents generating code at high speed, disciplined version control is the mechanism that keeps changes manageable, reviewable, and reversible.

When to Use

Always. Every code change flows through git.

Core Principles

Trunk-Based Development (Recommended)

Keep main always deployable. Work in short-lived feature branches that merge back within 1-3 days. Long-lived development branches are hidden costs — they diverge, create merge conflicts, and delay integration. DORA research consistently shows trunk-based development correlates with high-performing engineering teams.

main ──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──  (always deployable)
        ╲      ╱  ╲    ╱
         ●──●─╱    ●──╱    ← short-lived feature branches (1-3 days)

This is the recommended default. Teams using gitflow or long-lived branches can adapt the principles (atomic commits, small changes, descriptive messages) to their branching model — the commit discipline matters more than the specific branching strategy.

  • Dev branches are costs. Every day a branch lives, it accumulates merge risk.
  • Release branches are acceptable. When you need to stabilize a release while main moves forward.
  • Feature flags > long branches. Prefer deploying incomplete work behind flags rather than keeping it on a branch for weeks.

1. Commit Early, Commit Often

Each successful increment gets its own commit. Don't accumulate large uncommitted changes.

Work pattern:
  Implement slice → Test → Verify → Commit → Next slice

Not this:
  Implement everything → Hope it works → Giant commit

Commits are save points. If the next change breaks something, you can revert to the last known-good state instantly.

2. Atomic Commits

Each commit does one logical thing:

# Good: Each commit is self-contained
git log --oneline
a1b2c3d Add task creation endpoint with validation
d4e5f6g Add task creation form component
h7i8j9k Connect form to API and add loading state
m1n2o3p Add task creation tests (unit + integration)

# Bad: Everything mixed together
git log --oneline
x1y2z3a Add task feature, fix sidebar, update deps, refactor utils

Read the full file on GitHub · 368 lines

Files

What ships with it

7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago Changed · -32 tokens per session 43b28183211d
  2. 7d ago First seen · 368 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A b346d65a6f82

Subscribe to this mod's changes

git-workflow-and-versioning is a skill published in the GitHub repository seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skills (70 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 3,375 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to git-workflow-and-versioning, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.