Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skills --skill promptfoo-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/promptfoo-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/promptfoo-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/promptfoo-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/promptfoo-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seaworld008/commonly-used-high-value-skills/promptfoo-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.03196 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01598 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00639 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00320 |
Grade A, and why
promptfoo-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to promptfoo-evaluation — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 458 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Promptfoo Evaluation
Overview
This skill provides guidance for configuring and running LLM evaluations using Promptfoo, an open-source CLI tool for testing and comparing LLM outputs.
Quick Start
# Initialize a new evaluation project
npx promptfoo@latest init
# Run evaluation
npx promptfoo@latest eval
# View results in browser
npx promptfoo@latest view
Configuration Structure
A typical Promptfoo project structure:
project/
├── promptfooconfig.yaml # Main configuration
├── prompts/
│ ├── system.md # System prompt
│ └── chat.json # Chat format prompt
├── tests/
│ └── cases.yaml # Test cases
└── scripts/
└── metrics.py # Custom Python assertions
Core Configuration (promptfooconfig.yaml)
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://promptfoo.dev/config-schema.json
description: "My LLM Evaluation"
# Prompts to test
prompts:
- file://prompts/system.md
- file://prompts/chat.json
# Models to compare
providers:
- id: anthropic:messages:claude-sonnet-4-6
label: Claude-Sonnet-4.6
- id: openai:gpt-4.1
label: GPT-4.1
# Test cases
tests: file://tests/cases.yaml
# Concurrency control (MUST be under commandLineOptions, NOT top-level)
commandLineOptions:
maxConcurrency: 2
# Default assertions for all tests
defaultTest:
assert:
- type: python
value: file://scripts/metrics.py:custom_assert
- type: llm-rubric
value: |
Evaluate the response quality on a 0-1 scale.
threshold: 0.7
# Output path
outputPath: results/eval-results.json
Prompt Formats
Text Prompt (system.md)
You are a helpful assistant.
Task: {{task}}
Context: {{context}}
Chat Format (chat.json)
[
{"role": "system", "content": "{{system_prompt}}"},
{"role": "user", "content": "{{user_input}}"}
]
Few-Shot Pattern
Embed examples directly in prompt or use chat format with assistant messages:
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · -57 tokens per session 34b1b2a2747d
- 7d ago First seen · 458 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 91bf89196161
promptfoo-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository seaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skills (70 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 3,196 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to promptfoo-evaluation, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-observability-promptfoo
Testing and evaluation framework for LLM prompts and applications -- promptfooconfig.yaml, assertions, model-graded evals, red teaming, CI/CD integration, custom providers, and comparative evaluation.
prompt-evaluation-runner
Use when evaluating prompts, LLM outputs, red-team suites, or model behavior with local eval configs and safe provider/cost controls.
prompt-template-wizard
Rigorously collects and validates all fields needed to produce a complete, unambiguous prompt template for features and bug fixes. The skill asks targeted questions until the template is fully filled, consistent, and ready to paste into a Codex/GPT-5.2 coding session.
omh-llm-app-dev
This is a Hermes-native llm-app-dev workflow skill.
omh-model-setup
This is a Hermes-native model-setup workflow skill.
omh-model-optimization
This is a Hermes-native model-optimization workflow skill.