Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SebastianElvis/reaper --skill investigategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SebastianElvis/reaperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sebastianelvis/reaper/investigate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sebastianelvis/reaper/investigate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sebastianelvis/reaper/investigate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sebastianelvis/reaper/investigate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sebastianelvis/reaper/investigate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.04729 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.02364 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00946 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00473 |
Grade A, and why
investigate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 308 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Investigate
The core research loop. Run N investigation cycles, each testing a hypothesis and applying keep-or-discard discipline.
Usage
Invoke this skill by name with an optional cycle count. On slash-command hosts, prefix with / (e.g. /investigate 10).
# Run 10 investigation cycles
investigate 10
# Default: 5 cycles
investigate
Default: 5 cycles if no argument given.
Inputs
Always read before starting:
reaper-workspace/notes/problem-statement.md— model assumptions and property definitionsreaper-workspace/notes/ideas.md— the ideas to investigatereaper-workspace/notes/current-understanding.md— the "branch tip" of accumulated knowledgereaper-workspace/notes/results.md— what's been tried and what happened
Lazy-load only when needed (do not read upfront — load only if a cycle's hypothesis requires it or the "when stuck" protocol calls for it):
reaper-workspace/notes/paper-summary.md— the source paper (if provided)reaper-workspace/notes/literature.md— known prior work (organized by same-goal and same-approach)reaper-workspace/papers/— downloaded PDFs and per-paper notes (<id>-notes.md) from the literature review../reaper/references/methodology.md— proof/analysis patterns
The Batch Loop
Investigation runs in batches, not sequential cycles. Independent hypotheses are investigated in parallel by default; sequential execution is the fallback when dependencies exist.
Overview: Plan → Dispatch → Merge → Repeat
while cycles_remaining > 0 and not converged:
Plan: read ideas.md + notes/results.md → dependency graph → batch of independent hypotheses
Dispatch: spawn one subagent per hypothesis (parallel, in one message)
Merge: collect results → update notes/results.md → integrate "keep" insights into current-understanding.md
Plan Batch
- Read
ideas.mdandnotes/results.md - Identify all unresolved hypotheses. Check
notes/results.mdto avoid repeating failed approaches. - Build a dependency graph: does resolving H2 require knowing the outcome of H1? If so, H2 depends on H1.
- Select the largest set of independent hypotheses that can run concurrently. Cap the batch size at
cycles_remaining. - Allocate cycle numbers: pre-assign a contiguous range per subagent (e.g., batch 1 gets 001-003, batch 2 gets 004-006). Each subagent gets one or more consecutive numbers from its range.
- If all remaining hypotheses form a dependency chain, the batch size is 1 — this is the sequential fallback (see below).
- If all hypotheses are resolved, stop and return control to the orchestrator. The orchestrator will call
/brainstormto generate new ideas if needed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 308 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A b8c583c2879d
investigate is a skill published in the GitHub repository SebastianElvis/reaper (9 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 4,729 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
literature-review-agent
Step 3 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the literature search strategy from outline.json — discover candidate papers via web search, verify them through Semantic Scholar (Levenshtein > 70 fuzzy title match, temporal cutoff, dedup by paperId), cross-corroborate against Crossref + OpenAlex to…
content-refinement-agent
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules, deterministic 0-100 decision bands (Accept/Minor/Major/Reject) that drive a target-met early stop, and a Devil's Advocate…
agent-research-aggregator
Pre-pipeline aggregator that scans AI agent cache directories (.claude, .cursor, .antigravity, .openclaw) or any user-specified directory for experimentation logs, extracts insights and numeric results, and formats them as PaperOrchestra-ready inputs (idea.md + experimentallog.md). TRIGGER when the user says…
paper-orchestra
Orchestrate the full PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018) five-agent pipeline to turn unstructured research materials (idea, experimental log, LaTeX template, conference guidelines, optional figures) into a submission-ready LaTeX manuscript and compiled PDF. TRIGGER when the user asks to "write a paper…
section-writing-agent
Step 4 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). ONE single multimodal LLM call that drafts the remaining paper sections (Abstract, Methodology, Experiments, Conclusion), extracts numeric values from experimentallog.md into LaTeX booktabs tables, splices the generated figures from Step 2, and merges…
outline-agent
Step 1 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Convert (idea.md, experimentallog.md, template.tex, conferenceguidelines.md) into a strict JSON outline containing a plotting plan, literature search plan (Intro + Related Work), and section-level writing plan with citation hints. TRIGGER when the orchestrator…