What the reviewer found
A red-team/CI-CD pentest playbook documenting self-hosted GitHub Actions runner poisoning for authorized security research. The curl/exfil/C2 snippets use placeholder hosts (CALLBACK, ATTACKER) as attack examples to detect and remediate, not code the skill runs against the installer.
dual-use— a security tool that can be misused
What was read
The file as it ships in securityfortech/hacking-skills:
skills/cicd/self-hosted-runner-poisoning/SKILL.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 4things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 4 as false.
E1Sends data to an external URL — false positiveSC2Downloads and executes remote code — false positiveEA1Unrestricted tool access — false positiveNETMakes network calls — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.