Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sefaertunc/worclaude/coding-principlesnpx skills add sefaertunc/Worclaude --skill coding-principlesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sefaertunc/WorclaudeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00584 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00292 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
coding-principles scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coding Principles
Reference card. Depth and examples live in the linked skills — this file consolidates the rules, not the rationale.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
- State assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
See prompt-engineering/SKILL.md for eliciting quality and writing specs.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked. No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you wrote 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
When NOT to simplify: hot paths, stable legacy, framework boilerplate, security-critical code, code you don't fully understand. When in doubt, leave it — a working system is more valuable than a clean one. See the code-simplifier agent and /refactor-clean command.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Every changed line must trace to the request.
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- Remove imports/variables YOUR changes made unused. Leave pre-existing dead code unless asked.
- Never combine cleanup with feature work.
See git-conventions/SKILL.md for style matching and the /refactor-clean command for scope.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria up front. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a failing test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
Close the feedback loop BEFORE committing: change → verify → commit. Not: commit → discover it's broken.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 61 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 06b03306f9bd
coding-principles is a skill published in the GitHub repository sefaertunc/Worclaude (4 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 584 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
opencli-sitemap-author
Use when creating or maintaining OpenCLI site sitemaps: agent-facing navigation, page-state, action, workflow, API-reference, pitfall, and fallback knowledge for a website. Use after browser exploration discovers durable site context, when a sitemap is stale, or when promoting local site knowledge into the repo.
golden-rss
Use when testing the rss golden build.
omh-buzz
This is a Hermes-native buzz workflow skill.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
redteam-api-detail-pack
Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized API security testing, including BOLA/IDOR, authentication bypass, mass assignment, missing rate limits, and GraphQL issues. Use when a task belongs to the API testing domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.
redteam-postex-detail-pack
Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized post-exploitation testing after initial access, including privilege escalation, persistence, lateral movement, data collection, and cleanup considerations. Use when a task belongs to the post-exploitation domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.