planning-with-files

planning-with-files is a skill for Claude Code from sefaertunc/Worclaude. It costs 14 tokens per session (922 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for writing an implementation plan in a project file before changing code. The file records the goal, current context, phases, checks, edge cases, and work that is out of scope.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to break features into small testable phases, plan verification steps, preserve progress across sessions, and review the proposed work before implementation.
Why use it?
It gives developers a shared, reviewable record of what will change and how to verify it, especially when a task is too large for one coding session.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: when-to-use in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to break features into small testable phases, plan verification steps, preserve progress across sessions, and review the proposed work before implementation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sefaertunc/worclaude/planning-with-files
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add sefaertunc/Worclaude --skill planning-with-files
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sefaertunc/Worclaude

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for planning-with-files

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sefaertunc/worclaude/planning-with-files/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sefaertunc/worclaude/planning-with-files)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sefaertunc/worclaude/planning-with-files"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sefaertunc/worclaude/planning-with-files/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for planning-with-files

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sefaertunc/worclaude/planning-with-files"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sefaertunc/worclaude/planning-with-files.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 922 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00014 $0.00922
Opus 5 $0.00007 $0.00461
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00184
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00092

Measured 9d ago against content hash 8551ab5111b4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

planning-with-files scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/planning-with-files/SKILL.md · 128 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Planning with Files

The IMPLEMENTATION-PROMPT Pattern

Large tasks need a written plan before code. The plan lives as a file so it can be reviewed, versioned, and referenced across sessions.

File naming: IMPLEMENTATION-PROMPT-{FEATURE}.md in the project root or docs/ directory.

Structure:

# Implementation: {Feature Name}

## Goal
One sentence. What does success look like?

## Context
What exists today. What needs to change. Links to relevant spec sections.

## Plan

### Phase 1: {Name}
- Step 1: {specific action}
  - Verify: {how to confirm it worked}
- Step 2: {specific action}
  - Verify: {how to confirm it worked}

### Phase 2: {Name}
...

## Edge Cases
- {case}: {how to handle}

## Out of Scope
- {thing we're explicitly NOT doing}

Breaking Large Tasks into Phases

Each phase should be:

  • Independently testable
  • Committable on its own
  • Small enough for one session (or one focused block within a session)

Signs a phase is too big:

  • More than 5-7 steps
  • Touches more than 3-4 files substantially
  • You can't describe the verification in one sentence

Signs a phase is too small:

  • It's just one line change
  • The verification is "it compiles"
  • It doesn't move the feature forward meaningfully

The Plan-Review Workflow

Before implementing, send the plan through the plan-reviewer agent:

  1. Write the IMPLEMENTATION-PROMPT file
  2. Use /review-plan to trigger review
  3. The plan-reviewer (Opus) acts as a staff engineer:
    • Flags ambiguity
    • Identifies missing verification steps
    • Checks SPEC.md alignment
    • Questions unrealistic scope
    • Points out edge cases
  4. Address ALL feedback before proceeding
  5. Update the plan file with revisions

Don't skip review for non-trivial work. The 5 minutes spent reviewing saves hours of rework.

Progressive Implementation

Execute one phase at a time:

  1. Read the plan
  2. Implement the phase
  3. Run verification for that phase
  4. Commit
  5. Update PROGRESS.md
  6. Move to next phase

If a phase reveals the plan was wrong, STOP. Update the plan first. Don't improvise your way through a broken plan.

Read the full file on GitHub · 128 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 128 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 8551ab5111b4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

planning-with-files is a skill published in the GitHub repository sefaertunc/Worclaude (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 922 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

unicli-repair

Evidence-driven repair workflow for a broken Uni-CLI adapter. Trigger on a failed unicli envelope, a quarantined adapter, or an explicit adapter-repair request. Classifies non-source failures, edits only the reported adapter path, and uses the original command as a bounded oracle.

olo-dot-io/Uni-CLI · 68 tokens

autonomous-run

Prepare, start, inspect, resume, or stop a finite local overnight coding run after a human has accepted a Wayfinder terminal spec; coordinates a declared Claude/Codex maker and independent checker without pushing, merging, or writing to external systems.

PromptPartner/agentsmith · 53 tokens

authentication-patterns

OAuth 2.0, JWT, SSO, MFA, NextAuth/Clerk/Supabase Auth implementation patterns.

travisjneuman/.claude · 28 tokens

case-interview-practice

Interactive consulting case interview practice with structured frameworks, feedback mechanisms, and progressive difficulty. Use when preparing for management consulting interviews, case competitions, or business problem-solving exercises.

travisjneuman/.claude · 39 tokens

finance

Financial analysis expertise for financial modeling (DCF, LBO, M&A), valuation, financial statement analysis, capital allocation, treasury management, and corporate finance decisions. Use when building financial models, analyzing statements, or making investment decisions.

travisjneuman/.claude · 48 tokens

i18n-localization

Internationalization and localization for global applications. Use when adding multi-language support, handling regional formats, or preparing apps for global markets.

travisjneuman/.claude · 32 tokens