Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to SeifBenayed/cloclo. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SeifBenayed/cloclo/main/.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SeifBenayed/clocloWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/seifbenayed/cloclo/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seifbenayed/cloclo/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seifbenayed/cloclo/review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seifbenayed/cloclo/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seifbenayed/cloclo/review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00375 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pull Request Review
Review the current branch's changes compared to the base branch.
Steps
-
Determine the base branch:
- Try
main, thenmaster, then ask - Run
git log --oneline <base>..HEADto see all commits in this PR
- Try
-
Run
git diff <base>...HEADto see the full diff -
For large diffs, review file-by-file using
git diff <base>...HEAD -- <file> -
For each changed file, check for:
- Bugs: logic errors, off-by-one, null/undefined access, race conditions
- Security: injection, XSS, auth bypass, hardcoded secrets, SSRF
- Performance: N+1 queries, unbounded loops, missing indexes, memory leaks
- Error handling: missing try/catch, swallowed errors, unclear error messages
- Style: inconsistency with the rest of the codebase
- Tests: missing tests for new functionality or edge cases
-
Provide a structured review:
Summary — What the PR does (1-2 sentences)
Issues — Bugs, security, or correctness problems that should be fixed before merge
Suggestions — Non-blocking improvements worth considering
Verdict — Approve / Request Changes / Needs Discussion
Be specific — reference file paths and line numbers. Suggest concrete fixes, not vague advice.
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A f90a1a31ebb7
review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository SeifBenayed/cloclo (116 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 375 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…