Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to SeJonJ/ChatForYou. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SeJonJ/ChatForYou/chatforyou_v2_sage/.claude/skills/sage-feedback/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SeJonJ/ChatForYouWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sejonj/chatforyou/sage-feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sejonj/chatforyou/sage-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sejonj/chatforyou/sage-feedback.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01393 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00696 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00279 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
sage-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 127 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 9bd7ae1a868c
sage-feedback is a skill published in the GitHub repository SeJonJ/ChatForYou (109 stars, last pushed 27d ago), with no licence file. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,393 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
improve-codebase-architecture
A code-review guide for finding places where a codebase's modules are hard to understand, change, or test. It uses the project's terminology and recorded architecture decisions to suggest refactoring opportunities.
grill-with-docs
A code-review skill that uses project decision records and context documents to assess whether a change fits the system's architecture and domain.
design-lenses
Structured game-design critique: review a game through Schell's design lenses, Wright's systems-and-emergence lenses, and the MDA framework, producing severity-ranked findings with concrete fixes. Use when the user asks 'is my game fun?', 'review my game design', 'why is it boring?', 'critique this game', 'what's…
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.