Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add selvatuple/revibe-mcp --skill claude-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/selvatuple/revibe-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/selvatuple/revibe-mcp/claude-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/selvatuple/revibe-mcp/claude-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/selvatuple/revibe-mcp/claude-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/selvatuple/revibe-mcp/claude-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/selvatuple/revibe-mcp/claude-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00851 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00340 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
revibe scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s -X POST "https://app-backend.revibe.codes/api/v1/analyze" \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Revibe — Codebase Analysis
Analyze a codebase to understand its architecture, file roles, design patterns, execution flows, and system design decisions. Returns structured insights and saves agent_context.json for persistent codebase understanding.
Instructions
1. Determine the target
- If
$ARGUMENTScontains a GitHub URL orowner/reposhorthand, use that - If
$ARGUMENTSis empty, detect from the current directory:
Convert SSH to HTTPS if needed (git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null[email protected]:owner/repo.git→https://github.com/owner/repo) - If not in a git repo and no URL provided, ask the user
2. Check for API key
The user needs a REVIBE_API_KEY environment variable. Check if it's set:
echo "${REVIBE_API_KEY:-not_set}"
If not set, tell the user:
You need a Revibe API key. Sign up free at https://app.revibe.codes, then go to Settings → API Keys to generate one. Then set it:
export REVIBE_API_KEY=rk_live_your_key_here
3. Submit for analysis
curl -s -X POST "https://app-backend.revibe.codes/api/v1/analyze" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "X-Revibe-Key: ${REVIBE_API_KEY}" \
-d "{\"github_url\": \"GITHUB_URL_HERE\"}"
If status is "completed", skip to step 5.
4. Poll for completion
If status is "processing", poll every 10 seconds (max 3 minutes):
curl -s "https://app-backend.revibe.codes/api/v1/analysis/${JOB_ID}/status" \
-H "X-Revibe-Key: ${REVIBE_API_KEY}"
Show progress to the user as each step completes.
5. Show summary
Fetch the summary:
curl -s "https://app-backend.revibe.codes/api/v1/analysis/${JOB_ID}/summary" \
-H "X-Revibe-Key: ${REVIBE_API_KEY}"
Display it as a formatted summary card:
Revibe Analysis: {name}
Architecture: {architecture_pattern}
Language: {language}
Size: {total_files} files
Entry point: {entry_point}
Key Modules:
{name} — {description} ({loc} LOC)
...
Patterns: {patterns}
Database: {type}, {tables} tables
Sections available: {sections_available}
Full analysis: {project_url}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A e4560c557511
revibe is a skill published in the GitHub repository selvatuple/revibe-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 851 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
veris
Behavioral verification intelligence for autonomous coding agents. Use this skill when the user asks "what could break in this PR?", "which workflows changed?", "what should I test before merging?", "is this change risky?", "what's the blast radius of removing this function?", or any question about understanding the…
symbiote-impact
Trace the blast radius of a code change using Symbiote's dependency graph. This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze impact", "what will this change break", "show affected files", "check blast radius", "impact analysis", or "what depends on this".
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
codebase-design
Design maintainable module interfaces, review scoped code changes, and simplify implementations with behavioral verification. Use for code review, cleanup, testability, and module design work.
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
pr-blocker-summarizer
Summarizes open pull requests into a blockers-first standup digest. Activates when the user asks to summarize open PRs, find blocked pull requests, generate a PR standup, or triage review backlog from a PR export.