Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Senavictors/bootstrap-agent-architecture-plugin --skill bootstrap-add-rolegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Senavictors/bootstrap-agent-architecture-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/senavictors/bootstrap-agent-architecture-plugin/bootstrap-add-role)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/senavictors/bootstrap-agent-architecture-plugin/bootstrap-add-role"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/senavictors/bootstrap-agent-architecture-plugin/bootstrap-add-role.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.01448 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00724 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00290 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
bootstrap-add-role scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
bootstrap-add-role — criar ou atualizar um papel especializado
Entradas necessárias
- Nome do papel e seu objetivo principal — se o usuário não deu isso pronto, pergunte: "Qual o nome do novo papel e seu objetivo principal?" Peça também, se não estiver implícito: o que esse papel pode fazer sozinho, o que ele deve recusar/perguntar antes de fazer, e se ele tem poder de veto sobre algo específico (comum em papéis de banco de dados/infra).
- Quais adaptadores este projeto usa de fato — leia
AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.mdexistentes ou pergunte, se for a primeira vez. Nunca crie.cursor/ou.codex/"só para completar" se o projeto não usa essas ferramentas.
Procedimento
-
Confira duplicidade. Verifique se já existe um papel com responsabilidade sobreposta em
.claude/agents/. Papéis demais com fronteiras confusas são piores que poucos papéis bem definidos — se houver sobreposição real, sugira ajustar o papel existente em vez de criar um novo. -
Se o papel envolve uma operação de risco (banco de dados, deploy, infraestrutura), pergunte sobre MCP antes de decidir as ferramentas: "Existe um servidor MCP configurado neste ambiente para este recurso (ex.: um MCP de Postgres/MySQL com escopo de leitura de schema)? Se sim, qual?"
- Se sim: liste esse servidor MCP em
tools:no lugar de (ou junto com)Bash, e registre como regra obrigatória do papel que operações destrutivas (DROP,DELETEsemWHERE, etc.) devem passar por esse escopo restrito, nunca por umBashgenérico. - Se não existir ou o usuário não souber: siga com
Bashe a lista explícita de "o que não pode fazer sem perguntar antes" (mecanismo padrão desta arquitetura) — não bloqueie a criação do papel por falta de MCP, e não invente um servidor que não existe.
- Se sim: liste esse servidor MCP em
-
Escreva o conteúdo canônico em
.claude/agents/<papel>.mdprimeiro (é o mais legível para revisar), a partir deassets/templates/claude/agents/_role-template.md(reaproveitado debootstrap-init, ou o equivalente já usado no projeto). O corpo deve responder:- Arquitetura confirmada — citando pastas/namespaces/arquivos reais do projeto, nunca em abstrato.
- Regras obrigatórias, numeradas — com o "porquê" quando não for óbvio.
- Referências de código reais — 2-3 exemplos concretos, não pseudocódigo.
- O que pode fazer e o que não pode fazer sem perguntar antes — a segunda lista é a mais importante para prevenir dano; inclua aqui qualquer poder de veto declarado pelo usuário.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 57 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A 66db9329b1bf
bootstrap-add-role is a skill published in the GitHub repository Senavictors/bootstrap-agent-architecture-plugin (3 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 1,448 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
peekaboo
Provides runtime observation and interaction for native macOS interfaces through accessibility state and screenshots. Use when the task depends on visible or interactive state in a running SwiftUI/AppKit app: what is rendered, focused, selected, enabled, reachable through menus/windows/dialogs, or experienced across a…
improving-tests
Improve test design, speed, and coverage with behavior-focused tests, useful seams, characterization tests, TDD, and test refactoring. Use when improving tests, optimizing slow suites, adding coverage, refactoring brittle tests, removing test waste, or working test-first. NOT for fixing production bugs (use…
reviewing-code
Use when reviewing changed code, PRs, diffs, or specific files. Finds evidence-backed defects in security, correctness, tests, reliability, performance, maintainability, and docs. Supports quick, standard, deep, team, and external-review modes. NOT for repo-wide architecture review, general codebase exploration…
evolving-config
Audit and improve AI coding-agent configuration. Use when reviewing or changing Claude Code, Pi, Codex, skill, agent, hook, MCP, permission, package, or generated-export setup. Default is review-only; fixes require explicit user approval or --fix. NOT for score-only instruction review or prompt lint; use…
fixing-code
Fix code defects with a reproducible feedback loop, root-cause diagnosis, minimal patch, regression test, and clean verification. Use when debugging, diagnosing, or resolving lint/test/build failures. NOT for behavior-preserving refactors (use refactoring-code), test-suite cleanup without a production bug (use…
reviewing-instructions
Use when asked to lint, audit, review, or score AI-facing instruction files such as SKILL.md, AGENT.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, platform body.md files, prompt files, rules, policies, and agent-facing references. NOT for plugin manifests, application code review, harness configuration review, ordinary docs, tests, or…