Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/senlindesign/claude2figma/reference-interpreternpx skills add senlindesign/claude2figma --skill reference-interpretergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/senlindesign/claude2figmaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/senlindesign/claude2figma/reference-interpreter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/senlindesign/claude2figma/reference-interpreter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/senlindesign/claude2figma/reference-interpreter.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.00606 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00303 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00121 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
reference-interpreter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reference Interpreter
Analyze a reference (screenshot, URL, or description) and produce a Design Brief that maps visual observations to design system tokens. Output the Brief, then stop and wait for user confirmation before building anything.
Prerequisite: figma-preflight should have run so the Token Map and Style Registry are available.
Phase 1 — Analyze
Examine the reference across these dimensions:
- Layout — structure, columns, section heights, grid width, alignment
- Typography — heading/body hierarchy, weight contrast, tracking
- Color — dark/light sections, accent usage, neutral dominance
- Spacing — generous vs compact, section padding, internal gap
- Visual Anchor — what draws the eye: large type, hero image, illustration
- Components — what UI elements are visible: cards, buttons, forms, nav
Phase 2 — Map to Design System
For each observation, identify the specific Token or Style from the session's Token Map:
"Large dark headline" → Text Style: heading/h1 · Color: text/primary
"Neutral section bg" → Variable: background/surface-2
"Tight card spacing" → Gap: gap/xs · Padding: padding/sm
If no token exists, flag it:
⚠️ Gap: [observation] — no matching token. Options: (a) nearest match: [name], (b) add token first.
Phase 3 — Output the Design Brief
## Design Brief
**Reference**: [source]
**Section**: [what this covers]
**Aesthetic**: [3-5 keywords]
### Layout
[structure, height, alignment]
### Typography
- Heading: [Style name] — [why]
- Body: [Style name]
### Colors
- Background: [Variable] — [context]
- Text: [Variable]
- Accent: [Variable] — [used for]
### Spacing
- Section padding: [Variable]
- Internal gap: [Variable]
### Components needed
- [Name]: [from library? source]
### Gaps
- [Gap description] — awaiting decision
- (none) [if all mapped]
Phase 4 — Wait
Output exactly:
Brief complete. Type `confirmed` to begin building, or tell me what to adjust.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 89 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 3f9a06f191aa
reference-interpreter is a skill published in the GitHub repository senlindesign/claude2figma (198 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 606 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
prototype-web
可点击的功能性 Web 原型, 含导航、英雄区、特性区、CTA.
deck-course-module
暖纸背景 + Playfair, 左侧学习目标常驻, 含 MCQ 自测页.
make-resume
中文可编辑简历制作技能:默认基于 ASu 单栏高密度技术简历模板,根据用户经历制作或复刻可编辑 HTML/PDF;用户也可以指定仓库内其他模板、本地 HTML 或参考截图。用户输入“/make-resume”“我要阿酥同款简历”或要求制作、修改、复刻简历文件时使用。.