Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/seqra/opentaint/triage-dependenciesnpx skills add seqra/opentaint --skill triage-dependenciesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seqra/opentaintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/seqra/opentaint/triage-dependencies)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/seqra/opentaint/triage-dependencies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/seqra/opentaint/triage-dependencies.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00639 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00319 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
triage-dependencies scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: Triage Dependencies
Read the project's dependency libraries and flag the ones that can introduce a taint source — a place untrusted data enters
Inputs
Provided by the caller, fall back to the default value when omitted. Ask back only when a required input is missing and has no sensible default
project-root(optional) — root of the target project. Opentaint keeps all analysis artifacts under the fixed<project-root>/.opentaint/directory, so every.opentaint/...path below resolves there. Default: current directory
Workflow
1. List the dependencies
Read .opentaint/project/project.yaml — the dependencies list under each per-language projects entry is every third-party dependency the model resolved. Resolve each to the library it is. Most of a large project's dependencies are transitive infrastructure
2. Mark each library
For each library decide: could it introduce an attacker-controlled source — a method returning untrusted data (HTTP/RPC request data, message-broker payloads, deserialized untrusted input and so on)? Judge by the library's identity itself, read sources to get overviews, docs
3. Write the flag list
Write in .opentaint/tracking/coverage.yaml (per Tracking) a flat list of the flagged libraries' packages
When coverage.yaml already exists from a prior run, reconcile rather than overwrite: keep every listed package and add any dependency newly added to the model that could introduce a source. A flagged package whose usage shifted (new call sites, a version bump) needs no re-open — source discovery automatically plans any used member not yet verdicted. When unsure whether a package belongs, list it: an over-flag only costs one discovery pass, a missed library loses its sources on every later stage
4. Verify before returning
Re-check the full dependency list against your flags: confirm every dependency was judged, then re-read the ones you did NOT flag and make sure none of them can actually introduce a source. A library left out here loses its sources on every later stage and the run can't recover it. Add any package you missed to the list. This is a re-read of what you already wrote — simple grep or re-read is fine, no need to use some scripts.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 61 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 3b29523f669e
triage-dependencies is a skill published in the GitHub repository seqra/opentaint (151 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 639 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
plugin-code-review-orchestrated
Orchestrates a code review of the spring-plugin repository through scope/context passes, routing, domain reviewer subskills, and per-artifact validation. Use when asked to review a PR, diff, commit, branch, module, or file set, to run a full orchestrated review, or to produce a validated review report.
review-async-lifecycle
Normative reviewer for EDT safety, coroutines, cancellation, read/write actions, disposal, listeners and async lifecycle in the explyt spring-plugin. Use during orchestrated code review when the diff touches threading, background tasks, read or write actions, listeners, MessageBus, Disposable ownership or progress…
github-issue-manager
Classifies a user request as Bug, Compatibility, Feature, Question, or Task for the explyt/spring-plugin GitHub repo, lightly researches the relevant codebase, searches similar existing issues, and either reports an existing issue or creates a correctly titled and labeled one following the repository issue forms. Use…
review-core-correctness
Normative mandatory reviewer for correctness, contracts, architecture sanity, UX behavior, code quality and tests in the explyt spring-plugin codebase. Use during orchestrated code review of a PR, diff, commit or branch, or when asked to review correctness, logic, architecture or test coverage of plugin changes.
review-findings-validator
Normative per-artifact validator: reads exactly one reviewer artifact, re-verifies every claim against real source code, classifies findings as TP, FP, or Need more data, and writes exactly one validated artifact. Use during the validation wave of an orchestrated code review, when asked to validate reviewer findings…
review-persistence-security-resources
Normative reviewer for persistence, settings, secrets, logging hygiene, resources, caches, cross-platform behavior and long-lived state in the explyt/spring-plugin IntelliJ plugin. Use when reviewing changes that touch PersistentStateComponent, settings UI, credentials, caches, service fields, logging, file paths…