What the reviewer found
Code-review/QA skill with a prompt-injection hardening step (§6f Trust-Boundary Check). The hidden-instruction fixture (references/fixtures/injection-issue-body.md) and the curl | sh line are exactly what the check detects and reports as a finding, explicitly "never acted on"; allowed-tools are scoped, not a wildcard.
example-or-fixture— an example or test fixtureprompt-injection— tries to steer the agent
What was read
The file as it ships in sequant-io/sequant:
.claude/skills/qa/SKILL.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 3things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 3 as false.
P2Hidden instructions — false positiveSC2Downloads and executes remote code — false positiveNETMakes network calls — false positive
How this review was made
Fable 5.1 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.