Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sergezuber/FABULA-LLM-5 --skill plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sergezuber/FABULA-LLM-5Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01849 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00924 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00370 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
compose:plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to compose:plan — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Plans
Overview
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the compose:plan skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: If working in an isolated worktree, it should have been created via the compose:worktree skill at execution time.
Save plans to: the plans/ directory given in the <compose_docs_dir> block of your prompt, as YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md.
- (User preferences for plan location override this default)
Scope Check
If the spec covers multiple independent subsystems, it should have been broken into sub-project specs during brainstorming. If it wasn't, suggest breaking this into separate plans — one per subsystem. Each plan should produce working, testable software on its own.
File Structure
Before defining tasks, map out which files will be created or modified and what each one is responsible for. This is where decomposition decisions get locked in.
- Design units with clear boundaries and well-defined interfaces. Each file should have one clear responsibility.
- You reason best about code you can hold in context at once, and your edits are more reliable when files are focused. Prefer smaller, focused files over large ones that do too much.
- Files that change together should live together. Split by responsibility, not by technical layer.
- In existing codebases, follow established patterns. If the codebase uses large files, don't unilaterally restructure - but if a file you're modifying has grown unwieldy, including a split in the plan is reasonable.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 184 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 208787fb9e94
compose:plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository sergezuber/FABULA-LLM-5 (83 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,849 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to compose:plan, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
architecture-audit
Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…
e2e-testing
ORGII keeps two separate E2E surfaces. Do not use one as proof for the other.
dual-instance-verification
Dual-instance (双机) real-machine verification protocol for ORG2 cloud sync and session sharing. Use before declaring any sharing/sync/collab feature or fix "verified": share/unshare, push/retract, fork/import, comments, member-floor, replay, continuation, or anything touching Org2CloudSyncEngine, collab engines, or the…
org2-performance-guard
Prevent CPU, RAM, I/O, background-work, and false-green lifecycle regressions in ORG2. Use when adding or reviewing polling, timers, Realtime subscriptions, event listeners, workers, streaming paths, caches, pagination, provider-owned transcript ingestion or identity/dedupe, external-history scans, cloud sync…
react-best-practices
ORGII-specific React 19 performance review and implementation guidance, adapted from Vercel Engineering. Use for React performance, re-render, async waterfall, bundle, heavy dependency, virtualization, high-frequency event, Context/provider, or store-subscription work. Do not trigger for styling, copy changes, or…
create-orgii-agent
Create or modify a custom ORGII agent definition (and the org it belongs to). Use when the user wants to create, configure, retune, rename, or delete an agent, define an agent's soul / capabilities / tools, organise agents into an org, or asks about agent-definitions.json.