compose:tdd

compose:tdd is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from sergezuber/FABULA-LLM-5. It costs 17 tokens per session (2,358 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of compose:tdd, MIT.

A Test-Driven Development guide. TDD means writing a test first, confirming that it fails, then writing the smallest implementation that makes it pass before improving the code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Implementing features, bug fixes, refactors, or behaviour changes while following the fail-pass-improve testing cycle.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of implementing behaviour that is not properly checked and keeps feature, bug-fix, and refactoring work tied to executable tests.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Implementing features, bug fixes, refactors, or behaviour changes while following the fail-pass-improve testing cycle.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/tdd
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add sergezuber/FABULA-LLM-5 --skill tdd
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sergezuber/FABULA-LLM-5

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for compose:tdd

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/tdd/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/tdd)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for compose:tdd

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sergezuber/fabula-llm-5/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 17 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,358 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 98% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00017 $0.02358
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.01179
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00472
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00236

Measured 9d ago against content hash 241571de70ce, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

compose:tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

98% identical to compose:tdd — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

engine/packages/opencode/src/skill/compose/.bundle/tdd/SKILL.md · 361 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 361 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Test-Driven Development (TDD)

Overview

Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.

Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.

Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.

When to Use

Always:

  • New features
  • Bug fixes
  • Refactoring
  • Behavior changes

Exceptions (raise them through compose:ask; if no user is available, use your best judgment and proceed):

  • Throwaway prototypes
  • Generated code
  • Configuration files

Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.

The Iron Law

NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST

Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.

No exceptions:

  • Don't keep it as "reference"
  • Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
  • Don't look at it
  • Delete means delete

Implement fresh from tests. Period.

Red-Green-Refactor

The cycle: RED → verify fails → GREEN → verify passes → REFACTOR → verify still green → next test → RED …

  1. RED — Write one failing test
    • Verify it fails correctly (wrong failure → fix the test, back to RED)
  2. GREEN — Write minimal code to pass
    • Verify all tests pass (still failing → keep coding, stay in GREEN)
  3. REFACTOR — Clean up while staying green
    • Verify tests still pass after each cleanup (broke something → undo, stay in REFACTOR)
  4. Next — back to RED with the next behavior

RED - Write Failing Test

Write one minimal test showing what should happen.

const result = await retryOperation(operation);

expect(result).toBe('success'); expect(attempts).toBe(3); });

Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing
</Good>

<Bad>
```typescript
test('retry works', async () => {
  const mock = jest.fn()
    .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error())
    .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error())
    .mockResolvedValueOnce('success');
  await retryOperation(mock);
  expect(mock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);
});

Vague name, tests mock not code

Read the full file on GitHub · 361 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 361 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 241571de70ce

Subscribe to this mod's changes

compose:tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository sergezuber/FABULA-LLM-5 (83 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,358 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to compose:tdd, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.