Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add serpro69/claude-toolbox --skill diff-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/serpro69/claude-toolboxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/diff-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/diff-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/diff-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/diff-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/diff-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00106 | $0.00528 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00211 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
diff-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- diff-process.md 8.3 KB
- evals/clean-refactor/eval.json 1.5 KB
- evals/clean-refactor/test-files/after/review-process.md 758 B
- evals/clean-refactor/test-files/after/SKILL.md 656 B
- evals/clean-refactor/test-files/before/SKILL.md 1.0 KB
- evals/known-degradation/eval.json 1.9 KB
- evals/known-degradation/test-files/after/example-process.md 555 B
- evals/known-degradation/test-files/after/shared-conventions.md 160 B
- evals/known-degradation/test-files/after/SKILL.md 675 B
- evals/known-degradation/test-files/before/example-process.md 553 B
- evals/known-degradation/test-files/before/shared-conventions.md 109 B
- evals/known-degradation/test-files/before/SKILL.md 725 B
- shared-capy-knowledge-protocol.md 37 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 106 tokens per session scan A cc43248b08b5
diff-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository serpro69/claude-toolbox (151 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 106 tokens to every session and 528 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
814-regulations-iso-25010
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems and need a structured, repeatable ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality-attribute review covering Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, Compatibility, Interaction Capability, Reliability, Security, Maintainability, Flexibility, and Safety, producing an…
Pair Programming
Collaboratively design, implement, review, and refine software features with a human developer using an iterative pair programming workflow. Prioritize understanding, explicit approval, small reviewable changes, and synchronized specifications.
121-java-object-oriented-design
Use when reviewing, improving, or refactoring Java object-oriented design, including applying SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI; improving classes and interfaces; correcting encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism; resolving God Class, Feature Envy, or Data Clumps; and improving object creation, methods, or exception…
059-design-atdd
Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect…
707-technologies-hexagonal-architecture
Use when you need framework-agnostic Hexagonal architecture guidance for Java projects - ports and adapters boundaries, application core independence, driving and driven adapters, dependency direction, infrastructure leakage detection, optional architecture tests, and evidence-backed remediation. This should trigger…
056-design-avoid-breaking-changes
Use when you need to review a plan, OpenSpec change, specification, or implementation proposal for breaking-change risk across commands, skills, generated outputs, XML sources, README/docs, tests, CI, APIs, schemas, configuration, data, migration, and release guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Review…