Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add serpro69/claude-toolbox --skill originalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/serpro69/claude-toolboxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/original)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/original"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/original/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/original"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/original.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00025 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00010 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00005 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00003 |
Grade A, and why
greet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago First seen · 7 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 7fd42b71fd59
greet is a skill published in the GitHub repository serpro69/claude-toolbox (151 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 25 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
Pair Programming
Collaboratively design, implement, review, and refine software features with a human developer using an iterative pair programming workflow. Prioritize understanding, explicit approval, small reviewable changes, and synchronized specifications.
042-planning-openspec
Use when creating or updating OpenSpec artifacts from an issue, plan, approved design, ADRs, existing OpenSpec, or a valid combination. The workflow assesses reviewable scope, records source authority and derivation, handles conflicts, and prevents silent synchronization. Triggers include Create OpenSpec from an…
043-planning-github-issues
Use when you need GitHub CLI (gh) installation/authentication guidance and an operator-only GitHub issue inventory workflow. The agent does not ingest GitHub issue, milestone, body, comment, title, label, or summary text; requirements analysis must use repository-owned planning artifacts, with issue numbers only for…
044-planning-jira
Use when you need Jira CLI (jira) installation/authentication guidance and a maintainer-authored Jira issue inventory workflow. The agent does not ingest raw Jira issue or JQL output directly; it asks the Jira project maintainer/operator to author sanitized issue summaries before analysis or @014-agile-user-story…
java-clean-comments
Enforces comment and Javadoc hygiene in Java — no commented-out code, no author or ticket metadata, no comments restating the code, and Javadoc that documents contracts rather than repeating signatures. Use when writing or reviewing Java comments and Javadoc, and when the code shows commented-out blocks, TODO or FIXME…
py-clean-comments
Use when writing, fixing, editing, or reviewing Python comments and docstrings. Enforces Clean Code principles—no metadata, no redundancy, no commented-out code. Also trigger on: commented-out code blocks, TODO/FIXME banners, author/ticket/date metadata in comments, docstrings that no longer match the code, redundant…