Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add serpro69/claude-toolbox --skill review-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/serpro69/claude-toolboxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01508 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00603 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00302 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00151 |
Grade A, and why
review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/complete-omission/assertions.json 120 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/complete-omission/events.jsonl 190 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/complete-omission/final.txt 6 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/complete-omission/initial.txt 7 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/complete-omission/manifest.json 1.5 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/complete-omission/report.md 65 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/complete-omission/rubric.md 436 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/component/assertions.json 301 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/component/reviewer-output.md 113 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/early-edit/assertions.json 120 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/early-edit/events.jsonl 383 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/early-edit/final.txt 6 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/early-edit/initial.txt 7 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/early-edit/manifest.json 1.5 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/early-edit/report.md 65 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/early-edit/rubric.md 436 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/expected-verdicts.json 550 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/missing-events/assertions.json 120 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/missing-events/events.jsonl 190 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/missing-events/final.txt 6 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/missing-events/initial.txt 7 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/missing-events/manifest.json 1.6 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/missing-events/report.md 65 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/missing-events/rubric.md 436 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/ordered/assertions.json 120 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/ordered/events.jsonl 383 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/ordered/final.txt 6 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/ordered/initial.txt 7 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/ordered/manifest.json 1.5 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/ordered/report.md 65 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/ordered/rubric.md 436 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/README.md 2.2 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-missing/assertions.json 281 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-missing/events.jsonl 1.3 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-missing/manifest.json 1.7 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-missing/provenance.json 332 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-missing/report.md 148 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-missing/rubric.md 582 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-missing/source.py 43 B runs code
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-observed/assertions.json 281 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-observed/events.jsonl 1.4 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-observed/manifest.json 1.7 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-observed/provenance.json 332 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-observed/report.md 148 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-observed/rubric.md 582 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-observed/source.py 43 B runs code
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-omitted/assertions.json 281 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-omitted/events.jsonl 279 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-omitted/manifest.json 1.6 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-omitted/provenance.json 332 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-omitted/report.md 148 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-omitted/rubric.md 582 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/receipt-omitted/source.py 43 B runs code
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/requested-only/assertions.json 120 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/requested-only/events.jsonl 337 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/requested-only/final.txt 6 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/requested-only/initial.txt 7 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/requested-only/manifest.json 1.5 KB
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/requested-only/report.md 65 B
- evals/_harness/grading-fixtures/requested-only/rubric.md 436 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +1 lines d0368eb466a4
- 9d ago Changed · +15 lines c428c69603b0
- 2mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 1c88c9b4b163
review-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository serpro69/claude-toolbox (154 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,508 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
056-design-avoid-breaking-changes
Use when you need to review a plan, OpenSpec change, specification, or implementation proposal for breaking-change risk across commands, skills, generated outputs, XML sources, README/docs, tests, CI, APIs, schemas, configuration, data, migration, and release guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Review…
understand-diff
Use when you need to analyze git diffs or pull requests to understand what changed, affected components, and risks.
skills-pr-handle
Use when explicitly asked to handle a pull request in the Scenario skills repository, including review comments and skill validation.
pr-handle-comments
Handle review comments received on GitHub for the current branch's PR or a given PR number or URL, by triaging each unresolved thread, fixing what is warranted, pushing, and replying in each thread, when asked to address, fix or answer PR comments. Works in any Scenario repository.
pre-publish-review
Nuclear-grade 12-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (orchestrator manual QA plus one gate reviewer) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release…
work-with-pr
Full PR lifecycle in a fresh task-owned git worktree: implement via the ulw-loop skill with mandatory evidence-bound manual QA → reviewer-readable English PR → verification loop (CI + Cubic, where Cubic is skipped only when its quota is exhausted) → merge by default → worktree cleanup. Decomposes one task into the…