review-spec

review-spec is a skill for Claude Code from serpro69/claude-toolbox. It costs 44 tokens per session (1,638 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A guide for checking whether implemented code matches its design documents. It also checks whether the documents and implementation are consistent and current.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during development or after implementation to compare the code with feature designs and update inconsistencies.
Why use it?
It helps find missing work, differences from the plan, and documentation that no longer describes the code.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the kk plugin — 14 skills, 6 agents, 2 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it during development or after implementation to compare the code with feature designs and update inconsistencies.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-spec
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add serpro69/claude-toolbox --skill review-spec
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/serpro69/claude-toolbox

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install kk, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 14 skills, 6 agents, 2 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-spec

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-spec.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-spec)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/serpro69/claude-toolbox/review-spec.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,638 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.01638
Opus 5 $0.00022 $0.00819
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00328
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00164

Measured 8d ago against content hash 71cd81ddea46, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

klaude-plugin/skills/review-spec/SKILL.md · 123 lines

The source is not reproduced here

A licence we could not identify

The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 123 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 71cd81ddea46

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository serpro69/claude-toolbox (148 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,638 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

121-java-object-oriented-design

Use when reviewing, improving, or refactoring Java object-oriented design, including applying SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI; improving classes and interfaces; correcting encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism; resolving God Class, Feature Envy, or Data Clumps; and improving object creation, methods, or exception…

jabrena/plinth · 107 tokens

059-design-atdd

Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect…

jabrena/plinth · 93 tokens

056-design-avoid-breaking-changes

Use when you need to review a plan, OpenSpec change, specification, or implementation proposal for breaking-change risk across commands, skills, generated outputs, XML sources, README/docs, tests, CI, APIs, schemas, configuration, data, migration, and release guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Review…

jabrena/plinth · 106 tokens

707-technologies-hexagonal-architecture

Use when you need framework-agnostic Hexagonal architecture guidance for Java projects - ports and adapters boundaries, application core independence, driving and driven adapters, dependency direction, infrastructure leakage detection, optional architecture tests, and evidence-backed remediation. This should trigger…

jabrena/plinth · 102 tokens

053-design-simple-rules

Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design rules; Review this design with Beck's…

jabrena/plinth · 86 tokens

java-api-consistency-validator

Validate API consistency between two versions of Java libraries. Use when you need to compare API behavior, signatures, and exceptions between Java library versions to identify breaking changes, incompatible modifications, and behavior differences. The skill performs static analysis of Java code, compares method…

ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE · 95 tokens