Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sethgammon/citadel/autopilotnpx skills add SethGammon/Citadel --skill autopilotgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SethGammon/CitadelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sethgammon/citadel/autopilot)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sethgammon/citadel/autopilot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sethgammon/citadel/autopilot.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00050 | $0.01234 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00617 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00247 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
autopilot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/autopilot — Intake Pipeline
Orientation
Use Autopilot when:
- There are pending items in
.planning/intake/ - You want to process intake items without manual orchestration
- The work is scoped and well-defined (Small or Medium complexity)
Do NOT use Autopilot for:
- Large, multi-session campaigns (use Archon)
- Parallel execution (use Fleet)
- Exploratory or open-ended work (use Marshal)
Protocol
Step 0: DELIVERY PREFLIGHT
When the user names a specific intake file or asks for "intake to PR", prefer the deterministic delivery preflight before freeform build work:
node scripts/deliver.js --intake .planning/intake/{item}.md
If no specific intake file is named, use:
node scripts/deliver.js --next
This selects the highest-priority pending item in .planning/intake/ and keeps
the golden path deterministic.
This creates an active campaign with claimed scope, acceptance criteria, map
context, and exit evidence rows, then marks the intake item in-progress.
Continue from the created campaign with /do continue.
After build and verification, package the delivery before marking the campaign complete:
node scripts/package-delivery.js {campaign-slug}
If a PR exists, record the PR as the review target:
node scripts/package-delivery.js {campaign-slug} --pr https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/pull/{number}
Step 1: SCAN
Read all files in .planning/intake/ and identify:
status: pending→ needs briefingstatus: briefed→ ready to buildstatus: approved→ ready to buildstatus: in-progress→ check if stuck
Step 2: BRIEF (for pending items)
For each pending item:
- Read the intake file
- Read related files mentioned in the description
- Research the scope: what files exist, what patterns are established
- Write the brief:
- Scope: Small / Medium / Large
- Approach: How to implement (2-3 sentences)
- Files: Which files to create or modify
- Quality gates: What must be true when done
- Risks: What could go wrong
- Update the item's status to
briefed
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 163 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 9db32b5c0d60
autopilot is a skill published in the GitHub repository SethGammon/Citadel (916 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,234 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
compose-org
Run a task as an evolved multi-agent ORG using the installed liquid-org framework — where YOU (the running Claude) embody the org: you ask liquid-org which proven team topology + specialist personas to use (retrieved from its evolved pool, or assembled fresh), then dispatch ONE SUBAGENT PER TALENT to play each role…
liquid-rank
Rank the available skills by RELEVANCE to the current task, on demand, using liquid-org's read-only hermes skill ranker. This is an EXPLICIT, OPT-IN selector you invoke WHEN you want help choosing the most relevant skill for what you're doing — it is NOT default, automatic skill selection, and it does NOT decide for…
agent-workflow-playbook
AI Agent Workflow & Skill Architecture Guide — turn expert work into measurable, reusable agent systems. Covers workflow discovery, skill decomposition, harness design, evaluation, human escalation, observability, cost control, and multi-agent orchestration. Includes a measured marketing-delivery case: 15 people × 3–4…
present-gate
First-officer gate-presentation rendering — the captain-facing gate-review template and assembly rules, including workflow-owned finding labels. Invoke at the gate point after the FO has decided a stage must be presented.
audit-project
Run an iterative multi-agent code audit until critical and high findings are resolved. Use when the user says "audit my code", "find all the bugs", "deep code audit", "iterative review", or "review until clean".
contexts
Use when the user says "get context on X", "how does X work", or wants architectural orientation before coding.