Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sethgammon/citadel/postmortemnpx skills add SethGammon/Citadel --skill postmortemgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SethGammon/CitadelWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.01635 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00817 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00327 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
postmortem scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 191 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/postmortem — Campaign Postmortem Generator
Orientation
Use when: A campaign just completed and you want a structured analysis of what broke, what safety systems caught, and what patterns emerged. Also for ad-hoc incident analysis from recent git history.
Don't use when: You want to preserve session context for the next conversation (use /session-handoff), extract reusable patterns from findings into the knowledge base (use /learn), or score and improve quality iteratively (use /improve).
When to Use
- After any Archon campaign completes (Archon should suggest it)
- After a difficult debugging session
- When the user says "what just happened" or "what broke"
- When /do routes "postmortem", "retro", "what broke", "what happened"
Inputs
One of:
- A campaign file path (.planning/campaigns/*.md)
- A time range ("last session", "today", "this week")
- Nothing (reads the most recent completed campaign)
Protocol
Step 1: GATHER
Collect data from all available sources:
From the campaign file (if it exists):
- Direction vs what was actually built (scope drift?)
- Phase completion timeline (which phases needed rework?)
- Decision log entries (what architectural choices were made?)
- Review queue items (what needed human eyes?)
- Circuit breaker activations (what hit the limit?)
- Feature ledger (what shipped?)
From telemetry (.planning/telemetry/):
- hook-timing.jsonl: which hooks fired most, any patterns
- hook-errors.log: what was blocked, what failed, what had parse errors
- Circuit breaker trips
- Quality gate violations
From git history:
- Commits during the campaign period
- Files changed (which areas got the most churn?)
- Any reverts (what was undone?)
- Commit message patterns (fix: commits indicate bugs found)
From the session itself (if no campaign):
- Recent tool calls and their outcomes
- Files edited and errors encountered
Step 2: ANALYZE
Identify patterns across the data:
- What broke: List every failure, error, or unexpected outcome. For each: what happened, what caught it (hook/gate/human/nothing), what it cost (time, rework, tokens).
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 191 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 94add22a2465
postmortem is a skill published in the GitHub repository SethGammon/Citadel (914 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,635 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
debrief
This skill should be used when the user asks to "debrief", "record what happened", "session summary", "write a debrief", or wants to capture session activity (commits, task state changes, decisions, issues) into a structured record for the next session.
refit
This skill should be used when the user asks to "refit a workflow", "upgrade a workflow", "update workflow scaffolding", or wants to bring an existing workflow's scaffolding files up to date with the current Spacedock version.
fo-dispatch-recovery
Claude dispatch failure recovery — Break-Glass Manual Dispatch (the manual Agent() template) and Context Budget Failure/Dead Ensign Handling (the budget-unavailable stderr conditions, the recovery clause, dead-ensign bookkeeping). Read ONLY at its resident triggers inside claude-fo-dispatch.md — a non-zero or…
fo-status-viewer
First-officer status query/mutate/display surface — the status command flag docs, --set field docs, canonical captain-facing invocations, the Captain-Facing State Display rendering, and the GitHub-issue-filing approval gate. Invoke at the first ad-hoc status question, --set mutation, --next-id/--resolve lookup, or…
present-gate
First-officer gate-presentation rendering — the captain-facing gate-review template and assembly rules, including workflow-owned finding labels. Invoke at the gate point after the FO has decided a stage must be presented.
agent-workflow-playbook
AI Agent Workflow & Skill Architecture Guide — turn expert work into measurable, reusable agent systems. Covers workflow discovery, skill decomposition, harness design, evaluation, human escalation, observability, cost control, and multi-agent orchestration. Includes a measured marketing-delivery case: 15 people × 3–4…