wrap-up

wrap-up is a skill for Claude Code from sevenschulte/agentic-harness. It costs 57 tokens per session (979 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A handoff workflow for shipping the current code branch as a pull request. A pull request is a proposed code change submitted for review before merging.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when you want to test, format, commit, push, and open a pull request for the current branch.
Why use it?
It checks the branch, runs the project's checks, records uncommitted work, and prepares the change for review in one process.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sevenschulte/agentic-harness/wrap-up
Any agent
npx skills add sevenschulte/agentic-harness --skill wrap-up
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sevenschulte/agentic-harness

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for wrap-up

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sevenschulte/agentic-harness/wrap-up.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sevenschulte/agentic-harness/wrap-up)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sevenschulte/agentic-harness/wrap-up"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sevenschulte/agentic-harness/wrap-up.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 979 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00057 $0.00979
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00490
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00196
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00098

Measured 6d ago against content hash 2e07ea72c387, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

wrap-up scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/wrap-up/SKILL.md · 132 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Wrap Up

You are closing a work session. Your job is to update memory/ACTIVE.md so the next session has everything it needs to continue: where we were, what got done, what's still in flight, what's next.

Without this step, ACTIVE.md stagnates and the next session starts cold even though the codebase hasn't.

When to wrap up

  • User says "wrap up" / "let's stop" / "end session" / "that's it for today"
  • About to stop responding after meaningful work (a deliverable shipped, a decision made, an investigation concluded, a PR opened)
  • Switching to a completely different topic or project

Skip for purely conversational sessions with no deliverables.

Step 1 — Read the current ACTIVE.md

You are updating, not rewriting.

memory/ACTIVE.md

Expected shape (create if missing):

# Active Work

## Current Focus
<what we're working on right now>

## In Progress
- [ ] <task with a checkbox>
- [x] <completed task>

## Next Up
- <upcoming task>

## Parking Lot
- <idea to revisit>

## Completed
- **<title>** (<date>) — <one line>. Details: <pointer to memory/projects/...>

## Session Notes
*<date>:* <one-paragraph session summary>

Step 2 — Analyse this session

Identify:

  1. Focus — what was the main thing we worked on?
  2. Done — what got finished? (mark [x])
  3. In flight — what's started but not finished? ([ ])
  4. Next — what's the immediate next step for whoever continues?
  5. Blockers — what's waiting on something external?
  6. Discovered — new tasks that came up but aren't urgent? (parking lot)

Step 3 — Update ACTIVE.md

  • Current Focus: rewrite to reflect today's work, including status if relevant (blocked, in review, waiting on X)
  • In Progress: mark completed items [x], add any new in-flight items
  • Next Up: move items in/out as priorities shift
  • Parking Lot: append anything worth remembering later
  • Completed: one-line index entry pointing at the fuller write-up elsewhere. Don't inline long descriptions; details live in memory/projects/<...> or memory/research/<...>
  • Session Notes: prepend one short paragraph (date in YYYY-MM-DD, one paragraph summarising what happened and why)

Read the full file on GitHub · 132 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 132 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 2e07ea72c387

Subscribe to this mod's changes

wrap-up is a skill published in the GitHub repository sevenschulte/agentic-harness (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 979 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

llmwiki-query

Answer a question by querying the user's llmwiki. Use when the user asks about their own past work — "what did I decide about X", "what have I been working on", "how did I solve Y", "what's my preferred approach to Z", or any question that the wiki (built from their session history) might answer. Always read the wiki…

Pratiyush/llm-wiki · 87 tokens

continual-learning

Orchestrate continual learning by delegating transcript mining to agents-memory-updater and writing durable memory to local JSON (never root AGENTS.md Learned sections). USE WHEN continual learning, mine prior chats, maintain agent memory, or the stop hook triggers this skill.

docxology/template · 56 tokens

automotive-engineer

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Automotive Engineer — computing weight transfer and tire friction-circle limits for a braking-while-cornering maneuver to set brake-force distribution, sizing a powertrain and gear ratio against a 0-60 mph acceleration target while checking traction versus power limits, sizing…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 160 tokens

automotive-engineering-technician

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Automotive Engineering Technician — setting up and instrumenting test equipment (strain-gauge bridges, thermocouples, load/torque sensors) to an engineer's written test plan, selecting DAQ sample rate and an SAE J211 CFC filter class for a vehicle test channel, verifying…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 207 tokens

aviation-inspector

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aviation Inspector — determining whether an air carrier's fleet is in compliance with an Airworthiness Directive across a maintenance-records sample, deciding where the FAA's compliance-and-enforcement ladder places a finding (compliance action vs. Letter of Correction vs.…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 113 tokens

calibration-technician

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Calibration Technologist/Technician — computing a Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) and deciding whether it meets the 4:1 target, building a measurement uncertainty budget (Type A/Type B, GUM-style) for a calibration, tracing a reference standard's chain of custody to NIST/SI…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 112 tokens