finish

finish is a skill for Claude Code from sflandergan/agentic-coding. It costs 33 tokens per session (1,683 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A finishing workflow for a software feature that has already been implemented and reviewed. It records the feature in durable documentation, updates related project terminology and cleans up the work plan.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write a feature reference document, reconcile the glossary and architecture decision records, and close out the feature plan.
Why use it?
It prevents completed work from being left undocumented or inconsistent with the rest of the project.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to write a feature reference document, reconcile the glossary and architecture decision records, and close out the feature plan.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sflandergan/agentic-coding/finish
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add sflandergan/agentic-coding --skill finish
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sflandergan/agentic-coding

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for finish

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sflandergan/agentic-coding/finish/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sflandergan/agentic-coding/finish)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sflandergan/agentic-coding/finish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sflandergan/agentic-coding/finish/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for finish

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sflandergan/agentic-coding/finish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sflandergan/agentic-coding/finish.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 33 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,683 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00033 $0.01683
Opus 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00673
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00337
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00168

Measured 1mo ago against content hash dd8c3deea948, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

finish scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 4 executable files (scripts/ensure-fresh.sh, scripts/mark-pr-ready.sh, scripts/publish-and-ready.sh, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

core/agents/skills/finish/SKILL.md · 112 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the finishing agent for this repository. You finalize a feature once it is implemented and reviewed: evaluate each documentation authority independently, write or update compact package-driven feature maps when they materially help extension, reconcile the domain docs, and clean up the working plan.

Feature (if provided): $ARGUMENTS

Load first

Check git state before doing anything. Inspect the completed final diff grouped by changed package or feature-module root, the current implementation code for the affected packages, and the completed-plan evidence showing the change was implemented and reviewed. Then read docs/agents/finish.md and follow it — it lists the repository-specific plan paths, feature index, affected maps, guides, glossaries, and ADRs to load. Its ## Verify section defines the completion verification commands; if that section is missing, stop and ask the user how to proceed — do not invent commands.

Subagent usage

Dispatch the Explore subagent when finalization depends on repository investigation: affected packages, package roots, stable entry points, changed routes or jobs, or possible domain-language drift. Do not write durable docs from weak context; send Explore a focused question instead of guessing. Do not invoke implementation agents — implementation is already complete and reviewed when finishing starts.

Finish workflow

Run this ordered workflow from start to finish. Do not skip steps, reorder them, or proceed past a failure.

Step 1 — Confirm done

Verify the implementation is already complete and reviewed. Inspect the final diff and completed-plan evidence. Do not finalize work that is not finished.

Step 2 — Document the change

  1. Group changed files by package or feature-module root. Start from the completed diff and changed packages; map each changed package to the capabilities it affects, then decide which documentation authority changed: feature maps, architecture guides, context glossaries, or ADRs. Classification is based on the affected capabilities, not a fixed list of changed file paths.
  2. Inspect the index and affected maps. Read docs/features/index.md and the feature maps for the affected capabilities. Then independently evaluate the applicable area guides loaded on demand, the relevant context glossary for terminology only, and relevant accepted or deferred ADRs.
  3. Update or omit feature maps. Use the /feature-documentation skill when a map should be created, updated, merged, renamed, or removed. A feature map exists only when it materially helps extend a named capability or exposes a non-obvious ADR constraint. A compact map contains only a short overview and ownership boundary, a ## Main Packages and Entry Points list that prefers package or feature-module roots (name an individual file only when it is the stable entry point an engineer should open first), and applicable non-obvious ADR links. Omit the map when the change is maintenance-only unless a surviving map became inaccurate — maintenance-only work still requires map link repair when a surviving map points at moved packages or entry points.
  4. Reconcile the domain docs. A guide changes when reusable mechanics or cross-feature boundaries change; a glossary changes only when domain terminology changes. Create or update an ADR only when all three conditions hold: changing the decision would be meaningfully costly, the result is surprising without rationale, and genuine alternatives were considered and traded off. If an implemented ADR-worthy decision lacks reliable evidence of alternatives or rationale, stop and ask the owner; never fabricate a retrospective ADR. Keep glossaries as glossaries.
  5. Validate documentation. Confirm the feature index is synchronized atomically with every map addition, merge, rename, or removal; package and entry-point links resolve; documentation sits in the right authority; and maps contain no dates, branches, PRs, plans, status, tests, or verification history. Repair package/entry-point links after maintenance refactors even when behavior is unchanged.

Read the full file on GitHub · 112 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +53 lines · +33 tokens per session dd8c3deea948
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4f57176aee2a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

finish is a skill published in the GitHub repository sflandergan/agentic-coding (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,683 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens