Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sh0tn1k/telegram-ads --skill handle-telegram-ads-review-and-declinesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sh0tn1k/telegram-adsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sh0tn1k/telegram-ads/handle-telegram-ads-review-and-declines)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sh0tn1k/telegram-ads/handle-telegram-ads-review-and-declines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sh0tn1k/telegram-ads/handle-telegram-ads-review-and-declines/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sh0tn1k/telegram-ads/handle-telegram-ads-review-and-declines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sh0tn1k/telegram-ads/handle-telegram-ads-review-and-declines.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.05102 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.02551 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00510 |
Grade A, and why
handle-telegram-ads-review-and-declines scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 299 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Handle Telegram Ads Review and Declines
Operational procedure for handling moderation outcomes on Telegram Ads. Two flows:
- Declined ad — read the rejection reason, classify the policy category, propose a rewrite, re-validate, and either re-submit (new ad) or
edit_ad(existing ad) for re-review. - Approved ad — verify the approval is reflected in the tool's view, confirm
status: "active", and hand off to ongoing monitoring.
This skill is operational, not strategic. The actual creative direction comes from prepare-and-manage-tg-ads. This skill's job is to drive the tools, classify the rejection, surface the verbatim reason, and gate any submit / edit on the operator's approval.
When to Use
- A
create_adcall returnedstatus: "declined"or an existing ad showsstatus: "rejected". - the operator asks "why was this ad rejected?" / "what's the policy reason?".
- An ad is in moderation limbo (
status: "pending_review") and the operator wants to know what to expect. - A live ad is
status: "limited"(e.g. reach restricted) and the operator asks why. - The same draft has been declined twice — this skill is the right place to escalate the diagnosis.
When NOT to Use
- The ad is
status: "active"but underperforming → use theinspect_adworkflow andreview-campaign-resultsfor diagnosis. - The ad is being created for the first time → use
create-telegram-ads-campaign-workflow. - Bulk-cleaning declined ads → that's a separate cleanup skill / decision.
Operating Discipline (mandatory)
- Read-only tools (
get_ad,get_rejection_info,explain_rejection,validate_ad) are SAFE_READ and need no approval. - Any submission to moderation (a fresh
create_adafter rewrite, oredit_adon an existing declined ad) requires the operator's approval per the standard flow increate-telegram-ads-campaign-workflow. - No manual browser fallback to read the rejection page. The typed tools expose the structured reason. If they fail, surface the failure, do not bypass.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 299 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 6752fef5486e
handle-telegram-ads-review-and-declines is a skill published in the GitHub repository sh0tn1k/telegram-ads (0 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 5,102 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…