review

review is a skill for Claude Code from Sh3rd3n/megazord. It costs 13 tokens per session (1,733 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A two-step code review that checks whether changes match the planned requirements and whether the code meets quality standards.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing the latest commit, a specific plan, selected files, or recent changes.
Why use it?
It helps catch missing requirements and code problems in separate checks, whenever you choose to run it.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents.

Part of the mz plugin — 16 skills, 16 commands, 6 agents, 2 hooks shipped together

Good fit Reviewing the latest commit, a specific plan, selected files, or recent changes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sh3rd3n/megazord/review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Sh3rd3n/megazord --skill review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sh3rd3n/megazord

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install mz, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 16 skills, 16 commands, 6 agents, 2 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sh3rd3n/megazord/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sh3rd3n/megazord/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sh3rd3n/megazord/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sh3rd3n/megazord/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sh3rd3n/megazord/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sh3rd3n/megazord/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,733 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.01733
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00866
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00347
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00173

Measured 9d ago against content hash 27217fdfa31c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/review/SKILL.md · 221 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/mz:review

Perform on-demand two-stage code review (spec compliance + code quality) independently of the /mz:go pipeline. Users can trigger this manually at any time, regardless of the quality.review config setting. Spawns a reviewer subagent via the Task tool that checks changes against plan specs and code quality standards.

Reference @skills/init/design-system.md for visual output formatting. Reference @agents/mz-reviewer.md for the review agent definition.

Step 1: Display Banner

Output the stage banner:

+===============================================+
|  MEGAZORD > REVIEW                            |
+===============================================+

Step 2: Parse Arguments and Determine Scope

Parse the user's message (text after /mz:review) for the review target:

  • /mz:review (no args) -- review the most recent commit's changes
  • /mz:review --plan {phase}-{plan} -- review all changes from a specific plan (diff from before plan started to after plan completed)
  • /mz:review --files path/to/file.ts path/to/other.ts -- review specific files (diff of uncommitted changes, or latest commit affecting those files)
  • /mz:review --last N -- review the last N commits

Determine the diff to review based on the scope:

No args (default):

git diff HEAD~1 HEAD

--plan {phase}-{plan}: Compute diff range from plan's first to last commit. Read the plan's SUMMARY.md for commit hashes:

  1. Read SUMMARY.md in the phase directory for the specified plan.
  2. Extract the first and last commit hashes from the Task Commits section.
  3. Compute: git diff {first_commit}~1 {last_commit}

If SUMMARY.md not found, report error: plan has not been executed yet.

--files {file1} {file2} ...: Check for uncommitted changes first:

git diff HEAD -- {files}

If no uncommitted changes, find latest commit affecting those files:

git log -1 --format=%H -- {files}

Then diff: git diff {hash}~1 {hash} -- {files}

--last N:

git diff HEAD~{N} HEAD

Read the full file on GitHub · 221 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 221 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 27217fdfa31c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Sh3rd3n/megazord (3 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,733 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

finding-duplicate-functions

Use when auditing a codebase for semantic duplication — functions that do the same thing but have different names or implementations, especially common in LLM-generated codebases.

bobmatnyc/claude-mpm · 36 tokens

recipe-front-review

Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 29 tokens

new-skill

Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes npm run validate and npm run evals on the first try — generates skills/{name}/SKILL.md (with the mandatory "Do NOT trigger for:" clause and a Process section citing guide step ranges) plus skills/{name}/{name}-guide.md (sequentially numbered steps), then appends…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 145 tokens

brooks-test

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 161 tokens

anti-patterns

Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that greatcto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect (pre-impl), pm (planning), senior-dev (impl), l3-support (post-incident).

avelikiy/great_cto · 59 tokens

cost-model

Standardized cost-estimation framework for greatcto plans. Forces explicit LLM cost, infra cost, human-supervision time, and the (defensible) human-equivalent comparison. Output format is parsable by the board's /api/cost path — must follow exactly.

avelikiy/great_cto · 59 tokens