Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add shalintripathi/organic-os/plugin install organic-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shalintripathi/organic-os/onsite-apply)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shalintripathi/organic-os/onsite-apply"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shalintripathi/organic-os/onsite-apply/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shalintripathi/organic-os/onsite-apply"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shalintripathi/organic-os/onsite-apply.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.03575 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01788 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00715 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00358 |
Grade A, and why
onsite-apply scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 255 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Apply approved changes (the gate lives here)
-
Read profile + env file. Poll the channel first if telegram, via
core.approval.process_telegram_decisions(root, token, chat_id)- it persists the poll offset and tolerates unknown/stale ids without raising. -
List approved onpage-fix items. For each: a.
require_approved(path)- this raises on anything not approved. Never catch that error to proceed; report it and skip. b.snapshot()the post (title + meta + content if the proposal touches it) -> save tooutcomes/<item-id>-rollback.jsonin the brain repo. c. Apply via the CMS adapter (onsite.cms.adapter_for; wordpress or git-static percms.type- the git-static branch below replaces steps b-g):update_seo_meta/update_postper the proposal body. (update_rankmathremains as the WordPress adapter's alias forupdate_seo_meta.) d. Verify:get_rendered_head(target_url)- assert the new title/description appear in the rendered head. On mismatch:rollback()immediately, thenPYTHONPATH="$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/lib" python3 -m core status <item-path> failed --actor agent, append a signal "apply-verify failed", and alert. Never leave the item approved. e.PYTHONPATH="$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/lib" python3 -m core status <item-path> applied --actor agent; write an outcome recordoutcomes/<item-id>.md: what changed, when, rollback file, measurement due dates (+7d, +28d). Because the verify just succeeded, also write the re-verification window into the record, exactly these keys (see site-repo-contract.md):reverify: due: <UTC now+1h> # first scheduled re-check until: <UTC now+48h> # window end; drift watch owns the horizon afterhoo-daily re-checks the live values between
dueanduntilso an external revert (a bulk plugin restore, a theme update) surfaces within hours, not at the next audit. f. On a successful verify, refresh the drift baseline for this page (onsite.drift.snapshot_pageson this post id, merged into the storedonsite.drift.baseline_pathentry, thensave_baseline) so the change we just made intentionally is never flagged as drift by the nexthoo-dailyrun. g. IndexNow: when site-profile.yaml hasindexnow: {enabled: true, key: ...}(additive key), callhoo.indexnow.submit(host, key, [target_url])after the successful verify and record the returned status in the outcome record (indexnow: {status: N, submitted: 1}). A non-200 is recorded, never retried in-run, and never fails the apply. Skipped in dry-run - nothing changed, nothing to submit. -
Commit + push the brain repo if git. Summarize: applied / skipped / failed.
-
Outcome summary - the approver always hears what happened. Compose ONE message for the whole run and deliver it through the configured approval channel (telegram: one
sendMessageover the same transportsend_itemuses; slack/email: one post/send; in-session: print the summary; pr-merge: no live channel mid-cycle - append the summary to the run report and outcome records instead). Never send per-item messages. Content, one line per item:- applied and verified: item id + what changed
- partially-applied: item id + the exact human step from the status note - the approver must know what is waiting on them
- failed / rolled back: item id + the reason Silent success is a bug: whoever said yes hears the result, whether it landed, half-landed, or failed. A run that touched nothing sends nothing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 255 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 03999935e627
onsite-apply is a skill published in the GitHub repository shalintripathi/organic-os (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 3,575 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
seo-vertical-detect
Classify a website as ecommerce, local-business, blog-publisher, saas, docs, or generic (multiple may apply), and report detected locales, from the persisted PageSnapshot plus the platform detector's vertical hints. Used by seo-orchestrator to decide which conditional modules to run and how to reweight the scores.
seo-fix-apply
Writer protocol preloaded into the seo-fixer-writer agent — how confirmed SEO/AI-search fixes are applied (git pre-flight, backup, Edit/Write for local diffs, ticketed adapter CLIs for remote targets, re-verify, publish only on a second ticket, rollback) and the findings-array output contract. Used only by the fix…
audit
Audit a website or web codebase for SEO and AI-search (GEO/AEO) — produces two independent 0-100 scores (Search SEO + AI Visibility) plus a prioritized, evidence-backed report persisted on disk. Read-only; never writes to the project. Use when the user asks to audit, analyze, check, or score a site's SEO, structured…
ai-visibility
Fast-path AI visibility — get a brand's 0–100 Akii Visibility Score (computed by an open-source LLM judge against the brand's public footprint) with four-dimension breakdown AND a per-engine proxy map for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews based on FirstPageSage signal weights.…
seo-audit
Single audit entry point — surface-level scorecard or deep infrastructure dive depending on the requested mode. Default full mode produces a multi-layer scorecard across all 9 areas (crawlability, indexation, meta tags, headings, images, Core Web Vitals, JS rendering, mobile + security, structured data, internal…
optimize-page
Comprehensive single-page optimization across all three layers — traditional SEO (title / meta / H1 / internal links), AEO (chunk quality, direct-answer leads, FAQ extraction), and GEO rewrites using the tactics published by the Princeton/IIT Delhi GEO study (citation integration, expert quotes, statistics enrichment…