Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shck-dev/ccx-context-system/start-threadnpx skills add shck-dev/ccx-context-system --skill start-threadgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shck-dev/ccx-context-systemWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00130 | $0.01409 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00065 | $0.00705 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00282 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
start-thread scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Start or resume a thread — scratch workspace with a handoff doc
Topic requested: $ARGUMENTS
Project + config:
!bun "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/where.ts"
Current branch: !git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "(not a git repo)"
Existing threads:
!bun "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/threads.ts" --slugs
Do this
- If
$ARGUMENTSis empty, ask for the topic — don't guess. - Normalize the topic to a slug — run via Bash:
bun "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/slug.ts" "<topic>"(one shared identity function — never re-implement slugging by hand; if the variable shows as a literal, use theplugin root:path from the injected block above). Withticket_system: nonea thread is any unit of work; ticket-system adapters may extend this later. - If
<scratch_root>/<slug>/already has a STATE doc → RESUME. This is the normal day-2 path, not an error: no questions, no "want me to open it?" menu — brief and get to work. Treat slugs as the SAME thread when they match ignoring case and separators (CP-1758≡cp-1758≡cp1758— thenormalizeForMatchrule inscripts/lib/identity.ts): a near-match in the existing-threads list above resumes THAT thread. Never overwrite or re-scaffold an existing STATE (skip steps 4–6 entirely). Do all of this:- Read the whole STATE doc — Status, the ask, plan, current state, open/deferred.
- Pull live deltas (parallel; each optional-degrade — an unreachable source gets a one-line
note, never stalls the resume): current branch; a
git worktree list/git branch --listmatch on the slug; if a matching worktree/branch exists —git status --porcelain(dirty files) andgh pr list --head <branch> --state all --json number,state,reviewDecision --limit 1(whenghresolves). - Report a resume briefing — where the user left off (Status, next plan step, open items), then what changed since (branch moved / PR merged / dirty files). Explicitly flag any live fact that CONTRADICTS the STATE. End ready to work — not with a menu.
- Resume is read-only on the STATE doc — flag drift in the briefing; the session updates
STATE as work actually proceeds (the
state-freshness-guardStop hook enforces this before the session ends).
- Seed the ask from the conversation — there is no ticket system to pull from. If the goal isn't clear from context, ask for one line. Mark anything unknown as TODO rather than inventing.
- Create
<scratch_root>/<slug>/and write the STATE doc from the template below, filling the frontmatter (title: <slug>·kind: thread·summary:one-line blurb) and The ask. Use thestate_basenamefrom the injected config block (defaultSTATE.md). - Version-control check: if this is a git repo and
<scratch_root>is not ignored (git check-ignore -q <scratch_root>fails), ASK whether to add it to.gitignore— some people want the notebook versioned, some never want notes in PRs. Don't silently do either. - Report the path created and a one-line summary. (No need to run /ccx:save-state for
indexing — the
auto-compile-indexhook recompiles the INDEX on every STATE write.)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 101 lines · 130 tokens per session scan A 83e5ed1e0f88
start-thread is a skill published in the GitHub repository shck-dev/ccx-context-system (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 130 tokens to every session and 1,409 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
orchestrator
FULLY AUTONOMOUS Flutter development pipeline orchestrator. Smart routing: PM analyzes -> creates targeted tasks -> Orchestrator executes only needed agents. Supports Asana task URLs. Includes QE verification via Maestro E2E tests. 7-phase flow: PM -> TodoWrite -> Execute -> Review -> Tests -> QE E2E -> Close.
flutter-guide
Flutter/BLoC Clean Architecture patterns, review checklists, and testing guides. Background knowledge for flutter-dev, flutter-reviewer, flutter-tester. Not user-invocable.
maestro-flutter
Maestro E2E testing knowledge for Flutter apps. YAML-based flows, TestKeys, visual regression, Maestro MCP integration. Background knowledge for QE E2E testing phase.
android-kotlin-compose
Android development with Kotlin and Jetpack Compose. Use when user mentions "Compose", "Jetpack Compose", "Material3", "Hilt", "Room", "ViewModel", or needs to build Android UI, implement MVVM architecture, manage Compose state, or integrate Jetpack libraries (Navigation, Room, Hilt, ViewModel). Triggers on…
android-kotlin-coroutines
Android development with Kotlin Coroutines and Flow. Use when user mentions "coroutines", "suspend", "Flow", "StateFlow", "SharedFlow", "viewModelScope", "lifecycleScope", or needs to implement async programming, handle structured concurrency, integrate coroutines with Retrofit/Room/WorkManager, or write coroutine…
codex-advisor
Advisory consultation skill for architectural reviews, design decisions, code analysis, and technology evaluation. Codex provides recommendations without making code changes. Invoked by phrases like "consult Codex", "get Codex's opinion", "ask Codex about", "have Codex review", "Codex analysis", "validate this…